Jersey Judgment

Cotillard v O'Connor [2007] JLR_Note 12 (12 January 2007)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the servitude in question imposed a restriction on building.

Court disposition

judgment for applicant

02

Material facts

Parties

Cotillard

Applicant

O'Connor

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether a servitude imposes a restriction on building

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey land law

    Servitudes may impose restrictions on building.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the servitude in question imposed a restriction on building.

Court disposition

judgment for applicant

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Cotillard v O'Connor [2007] JLR_Note 12 (12 January 2007) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N012.html Cite as: [2007] JLR_Note 12 [ New search ] [ Help ] Cotillard v O'Connor 2007 JLR Note 12 (12 January 2007) Land Law- servitudes -restriction on building The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2007 JLR Note 12 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N012.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.