Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Property law [2022] JCA 157

Russell and Russell v Falle

Russell and Russell v Falle [2022] JCA 157 (27 July 2022)

The Court of Appeal upheld a servitude access right allowing Mr Falle to use Beach House land and scaffolding to repair and bring La Côte’s northern gable into compliance.

  • Interpretation of servitudes
  • Right of access
  • Maintenance obligations
  • Implied rights
  • Construction of contractual clauses
  • Servitudes
Read case analysis
Property law

Morgan v Heaven

The Royal Court held that a patio wall and parking did not unlawfully encroach on a right of way, but awarded the plaintiff ÂŁ1,000 for temporary interference.

  • Right of way
  • Encroachment
  • Construction of deeds
  • Access and parking
  • Damages
  • Property-law
Read case analysis
Property law [2022] JRC 060

Morgan v Heaven

Morgan v Heaven [2022] JRC 060 (04 March 2022)

The Royal Court held that a walled patio and vehicle parking did not unlawfully encroach on a 1974 right of way, but awarded ÂŁ1,000 for temporary interference during works.

  • Right of way
  • Encroachment
  • Ancillary rights
  • Interpretation of deeds
  • Right-of-way
  • Servitudes
Read case analysis
Property law [2018] JRC 177

Bateman v Angel Fish Limited

Bateman v Angel Fish Limited [2018] JRC 177 (25 September 2018)

The Royal Court of Jersey construed 1908 restrictive covenants on Bentcliffe, granting declarations on wall and roof height limits but refusing a broader height interpretation and any ruling on the proposed scheme.

  • Servitudes
  • Restrictive covenants
  • Interpretation of contracts
  • Declaratory relief
  • Restrictive-covenants
  • Declaratory-relief
Read case analysis
Property law [2017] JCA 096

Fogarty -v- St Martin's Cottage Limited

Fogarty -v- St Martin's Cottage Limited [2017] JCA 096 (20 June 2017)

Leave to appeal to the Privy Council was refused in a boundary-encroachment dispute involving customary law reliefs and destination de père de famille.

  • Boundary disputes
  • Encroachment
  • Servitudes
  • Damages in lieu of injunction
  • Customary law principles
  • Appeals procedure
Read case analysis
Property law [2016] JCA 180

Fogarty -v- St Martin's Cottage Limited

Fogarty -v- St Martin's Cottage Limited [2016] JCA 180 (05 October 2016)

The Court of Appeal held that a boundary contract moved the boundary and, on the facts, destination de père de famille applied. Damages in lieu of removal were also upheld.

  • Boundary disputes
  • Encroachment
  • Servitudes
  • Relief (property law)
  • Estoppel
  • Interpretation of contracts
Read case analysis
Property law [2016] 2 JLR 246

Fogarty v. St. Martin's Cottage

Fogarty v. St. Martin's Cottage [2016] 2 JLR 246 (05 October 2016)

The court recognized an implied servitude after a boundary contract created an encroachment, applying the customary-law principle of destination de père de famille.

  • Servitudes
  • Implied rights
  • Boundary contracts
  • Destination de père de famille
  • Implied-rights
  • Boundary-contracts
Read case analysis
Contract law [2016] JRC 153

Minister for Infrastructure -v- Parish of St Helier

Minister for Infrastructure -v- Parish of St Helier [2016] JRC 153 (02 September 2016)

The Jersey Royal Court held that the Bellozanne covenants were tied to the existing destructors and had expired when they were dismantled, so refuse charges could be introduced.

  • Interpretation of contracts
  • Servitudes
  • Public property
  • Polluter pays principle
  • Declaratory relief
  • Contract-interpretation
Read case analysis
Property law [2015] JRC 068

Fogarty -v- St Martins Cottage Ltd

Fogarty -v- St Martins Cottage Ltd [2015] JRC 068 (10 April 2015)

The Jersey Royal Court held a boundary contract valid, rejected the defendant’s defences, and ordered removal or alteration of encroachments, with damages to be assessed.

  • Boundary disputes
  • Encroachment
  • Rectification of contract
  • Estoppel
  • Servitudes
  • Boundary-disputes
Read case analysis
Property law [2009] JLR 116

La Petite Croatie v Ledo

La Petite Croatie v Ledo [2009] JLR 116 (29 April 2009)

A Jersey land law decision on servitudes, holding that ambiguity in a servitude’s terms is resolved in favour of the servient tenement.

  • Servitudes
  • Dominant and servient tenements
  • Interpretation of burdens
  • Dominant-and-servient-tenements
  • Interpretation-of-burdens
  • Property-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.