Jersey Judgment

F v S [1997] JLR 160 (30 June 1997)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Access to a non-custodial parent may be denied in the short-term if their violent or uncontrollable temper creates a risk of harm, including indirect emotional harm to the child through the custodial parent's reaction, and access may be less important if the child is very young.

Court disposition

Access to non-custodial parent may be denied in the short-term under specified circumstances.

02

Material facts

Parties

F

Applicant

S

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Family Law Children Access / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Access should not be denied to the non-custodial parent unless there is a direct risk to the child.
Respondent
Access should be denied if the non-custodial parent's violent or uncontrollable temper creates a risk of harm, including emotional harm to the child through the custodial parent's reaction.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [1997] JLR 160

    Access to a non-custodial parent may be denied in the short-term if a violent or uncontrollable temper creates a risk of harm, even if not a direct risk to the child but a risk that the child's emotional well-being is damaged by the reaction of the custodial parent.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Access to a non-custodial parent may be denied in the short-term if their violent or uncontrollable temper creates a risk of harm, including indirect emotional harm to the child through the custodial parent's reaction, and access may be less important if the child is very young.

Court disposition

Access to non-custodial parent may be denied in the short-term under specified circumstances.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1997] JLR 160

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> F v S [1997] JLR 160 (30 June 1997) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970160.html Cite as: [1997] JLR 160 [ New search ] [ Help ] F v S 1997 JLR 160 (30 June 1997) Family Law - children - access - access to non-custodial parent may be denied in short-term if, e.g. violent, uncontrollable temper creates risk of harm, even if not direct risk to child but risk that emotional well-being damaged by reaction of custodial parent-access may be less important if child very young The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1997 JLR 160 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970160.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.