Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
G v A [2005] JRC 029 (14 March 2005)
The court found that the father and his family had alienated two young boys from their mother and ordered access to resume without delay.
GS v DS [2004] JRC 199 (15 November 2004)
The Royal Court held it has inherent jurisdiction to order access to a child for a non-blood relative if that is in the child’s best interests.
B v N [2002] JCA 135 (18 July 2002)
Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal out of time and ordered a psychiatrist’s paper review to assist a Royal Court access dispute involving alleged parental alienation.
F v B [2002] JRC 121 (27 June 2002)
The court granted F supervised access to his daughter D for three months, finding insufficient proof of abuse and emphasizing D's welfare.
F v S [2000] JRC 211 (27 October 2000)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused a father's application for direct access to his child, holding that the child's welfare and existing fear of him were paramount.
C v D [2000] JLR 334 (19 September 2000)
A Jersey family law decision on child access, holding that the child’s interests are paramount and access should generally be ordered unless strong reasons justify refusal.
C v D [2000] JRC 185A (19 September 2000)
A Jersey court refused a father direct contact with his young son because of proved domestic violence and the mother’s genuine trauma, but ordered facilitated indirect contact.
F v S [1997] JLR 160 (30 June 1997)
The court held that short-term denial of access to a non-custodial parent may be justified where a violent or uncontrollable temper creates risk of harm, including indirect emotional harm.
P v Y [1997] JLR_Note 11a (30 April 1997)
A Jersey family law note concerning child access where an allegation of sexual abuse was raised.
re T (infant) adoption & access applications [1988] JRC 248 (20 December 1988)
The court determined adoption and access applications concerning infant T, applying the child’s welfare as the paramount consideration.
Explore more
