Jersey Judgment

Haas (nee Daniel) v Duquemin [2002] JLR 27 (17 January 2002)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the use of a co-owned yard for parking by a co-owner is not subject to the right of veto, as the veto is limited to actions that alter the property or proprietary rights.

Court disposition

Applicant's claim dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Haas (nee Daniel)

Applicant

Duquemin

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Land Law Co Ownership Dispute / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether a co-owner's right of veto extends to the use of co-owned property for parking

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the use of the co-owned yard for parking by a co-owner should be subject to the right of veto by the other co-owner.
Respondent
The respondent contended that the right of veto is limited to actions altering the property or proprietary rights, and does not extend to ordinary use such as parking.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey Land Law

    The right of veto of a co-owner is restricted to actions altering the property or proprietary rights.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the use of a co-owned yard for parking by a co-owner is not subject to the right of veto, as the veto is limited to actions that alter the property or proprietary rights.

Court disposition

Applicant's claim dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2002] JLR 27

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Haas (nee Daniel) v Duquemin [2002] JLR 27 (17 January 2002) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2002/JLR020027.html Cite as: [2002] JLR 27 [ New search ] [ Help ] Haas (nee Daniel) v Duquemin 2002 JLR 27 (17 January 2002) Land Law-ownership en indivis-rights of co-owner-right of veto restricted to actions altering property or proprietary rights-use of co-owned yard for parking by co-owner not subject to veto The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2002 JLR 27 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2002/JLR020027.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.