Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Fogarty v. St. Martin's Cottage [2015] 1 JLR 356 (10 April 2015)
A Jersey land dispute over minor boundary encroachment ended with modest damages instead of demolition or window alterations, which the court found disproportionate.
Charles House v Primal Properties [2013] 1 JLR 36 (13 December 2012)
The Royal Court held it lacked jurisdiction to make a possession order in separate proceedings; that jurisdiction lay with the Petty Debts Court.
Devy v Taylor [2011] JLR_Note 37 (24 August 2011)
A Jersey land law note concerning whether a caveat should remain in place to prevent the sale of land pending resolution of the dispute.
Cooke v Mold [2010] JLR 193 (14 May 2010)
The court held that an invitation to tender for property was an invitation to treat, not an offer. The vendor could accept any bid, including a referential bid.
D v N [2007] JLR_Note 43 (27 June 2007)
A Jersey land law case note in which the court ordered execution of a contract for the passing of land.
Cotillard v O'Connor [2007] JLR_Note 12 (12 January 2007)
A Jersey land law note on whether a servitude can restrict building; the court held that the servitude in question did impose a building restriction.
Mackinnon v Crill (No. 1) [2006] JLR 499 (09 November 2006)
The court held that a caveat preventing sale of land should be necessary and proportionate, with the applicant notifying the debtor and considering alternative security.
Mackinnon v Crill (No. 2) [2006] JLR 510 (09 November 2006)
The court held that a caveat to prevent sale of land may be lodged even if the debtor disputes the claim, provided there is a good arguable claim and the court is informed.
Crook and Renouf v Greffier of the States [2004] JRC 212 (06 December 2004)
The Jersey Royal Court held the claimants had an arguable case on compulsory purchase valuation and directed the arbitrators to state a case, while staying proceedings for mediation.
P and E v Lesquende Ltd [2003] JRC 167 (19 September 2003)
The Royal Court held that the Board misdirected itself on whether rezoning could form part of the compulsory purchase scheme under the Point Gourde principle.
Explore more
