Hamon v Webster [2002] JLR_Note 30 (19 July 2002)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Rescission of contract for breach can be effected without court intervention.
Court disposition
Rescission permitted without court recourse.
02
Material facts
Parties
Hamon
ApplicantWebster
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether rescission of contract can occur without recourse to court in case of breach
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey Law Reports
Rescission for breach may occur without recourse to court.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Rescission of contract for breach can be effected without court intervention.
Court disposition
Rescission permitted without court recourse.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Hamon v Webster [2002] JLR_Note 30 (19 July 2002) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2002/JLR02N030.html Cite as: [2002] JLR_Note 30 [ New search ] [ Help ] Hamon v Webster 2002 JLR Note 30 (19 July 2002) Contract-rescission-breach-rescission without recourse to court The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2002 JLR Note 30 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2002/JLR02N030.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.