Jersey Judgment

In re Pitman v [2014] 1 JLR 151 (10 January 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court has discretion to allow remise de biens but should prefer a declaration of desastre unless the interests of justice require otherwise.

Court disposition

remise de biens refused; desastre preferred

02

Material facts

Parties

Pitman

Debtor

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bankruptcy / Application for Remise De Biens

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the court should allow remise de biens or order a desastre in bankruptcy proceedings

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant seeks the court's discretion to allow remise de biens rather than a declaration of desastre.
Respondent
Respondent contends that a desastre is preferable unless the interests of justice require otherwise.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    2014 (1) JLR 151

    It is preferable to order a desastre rather than remise de biens unless the interests of justice require otherwise.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court has discretion to allow remise de biens but should prefer a declaration of desastre unless the interests of justice require otherwise.

Court disposition

remise de biens refused; desastre preferred

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2014] 1 JLR 151

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Pitman v [2014] 1 JLR 151 (10 January 2014) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR141151.html Cite as: [2014] 1 JLR 151 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Pitman v 2014 (1) JLR 151 (10 January 2014) Bankruptcy-remise de biens-court's discretion to allow remise-preferable to order desastre rather than remise de biens unless interests of justice require otherwise The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2014 (1) JLR 151 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR141151.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.