Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Representation of Powell [2018] JCA 113 (29 June 2018)
Single-judge Court of Appeal decision refusing leave to appeal and a stay in a Remise de Biens matter involving Mrs Powell.
Representation of Powell [2018] JCA 099 (01 June 2018)
The Court of Appeal held that the Royal Court’s 20 April 2018 decision was interlocutory, so Mrs Powell needed leave to appeal rather than an automatic right.
Representation of Powell [2018] JRC 073 (20 April 2018)
The Royal Court held that Mrs Powell’s remise de biens had expired unsuccessfully, deemed cession générale followed, and the stay on dégrèvement proceedings was lifted.
The Royal Court authorized payment of the surplus from a remise to the bank, provided the bank undertook to pay any company creditors later proved to exist.
In the matter of representations of GG Investments Ltd and Tygres Investments Ltd [2017] JRC 102 (30 June 2017)
The Jersey Royal Court refused two applications for remise de biens, holding there was no sufficient prospect of surplus for unsecured creditors and no jurisdiction on the figures.
Viberts -v- Powell [2016] JRC 205 (10 November 2016)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted Viberts leave to enforce a costs order against Mrs Powell, finding her assets exceeded liabilities and no unfairness in enforcement.
The Royal Court refused Reva Holdings Limited’s doléance, holding there was no excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice and no basis to overturn the Remise refusal.
Representation of Reva Holdings Limited [2014] JRC 026 (27 January 2014)
The Royal Court refused Reva Holdings Limited’s petition for doléance, holding there was no breach of natural justice or legal error in refusing a Remise de biens.
In re Pitman v [2014] 1 JLR 151 (10 January 2014)
Bankruptcy application concerning remise de biens and desastre. The court held that desastre is generally preferable unless the interests of justice require remise de biens.
In the matter of Reva Holdings Ltd [2013] JRC 208 (25 October 2013)
The Royal Court refused Reva Holdings Limited’s application for a Remise de Biens, finding no surplus for unsecured creditors after secured debts and expenses.
Explore more
