Jersey Judgment

Milho v Att. Gen. [2000] JLR 363 (19 October 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Failure to provide a breath specimen within the single 3-minute opportunity provided by police constitutes an offence under the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7).

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Milho

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether police are obliged to give more than one 3-minute opportunity to provide a breath specimen under Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7)

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contended that the police should have provided more than one 3-minute opportunity to give a breath specimen.
Respondent
The respondent argued that only one 3-minute opportunity is required by law, and failure to provide a specimen within that time constitutes an offence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7), as amended

    Police are only obliged to give one 3-minute opportunity for a breath specimen.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Failure to provide a breath specimen within the single 3-minute opportunity provided by police constitutes an offence under the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7).

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JLR 363

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Milho v Att. Gen. [2000] JLR 363 (19 October 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000363.html Cite as: [2000] JLR 363 [ New search ] [ Help ] Milho v Att. Gen. 2000 JLR 363 (19 October 2000) Road Traffic - driving under influence of drink - failure to provide specimen for analysis - police only obliged to give one 3-minute opportunity for breath specimen-if none provided during that time, then failure under Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7), as amended The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2000 JLR 363 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000363.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, art. 16C(7)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.