Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2020] JRC 173A

AG v H

AG v H [2020] JRC 173A (01 September 2020)

The court ruled on admissibility of a defendant’s statements and digital evidence in a rape trial, admitting the confession but excluding most phone material.

  • Admissibility of confession
  • Background evidence
  • Bad character evidence
  • Rape
  • Sexual offences
  • Police procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2012] 2 JLR 135

Att. Gen. v Rzeszowski

Att. Gen. v Rzeszowski [2012] 2 JLR 135 (07 August 2012)

The court held that voluntary prison statements overheard and noted by police were admissible, and no rule required a written record to be put to the accused.

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Voluntary statements
  • Police procedure
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
  • Voluntary-statements
  • Police-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2012] JRC 133B

AG -v- Linden

AG -v- Linden [2012] JRC 133B (10 July 2012)

The court partly allowed a pre-trial challenge to evidence in a dangerous-driving prosecution, excluding one police confession but admitting a paramedic statement and eyewitness evidence.

  • Exclusion of evidence
  • Confessions
  • Police procedure
  • Fair trial
  • Dangerous driving
  • Admissibility of witness testimony
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Att. Gen. v Parrington

Att. Gen. v Parrington [2003] JLR_Note 57 (01 December 2003)

Note on whether an accused may request blood, breath, or urine tests during police procedure in a Jersey criminal matter.

  • Police procedure
  • Blood, breath and urine tests
  • Request by accused
  • Criminal-law
  • Police-procedure
  • Evidence-testing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2000] JLR 363

Milho v Att. Gen.

Milho v Att. Gen. [2000] JLR 363 (19 October 2000)

Appeal over failure to provide a breath specimen under Jersey road traffic law. The court held police need only give one 3-minute opportunity.

  • Driving under influence
  • Failure to provide specimen
  • Breath analysis
  • Police procedure
  • Driving-under-influence
  • Failure-to-provide-specimen
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Goodman v Att. Gen.

Goodman v Att. Gen. [1995] JLR_Note 11c (27 September 1995)

The court held that a break in a police interview did not, by itself, invalidate a caution or make later statements inadmissible if the suspect remained aware of their rights.

  • Police procedure
  • Statements to police
  • Administering caution
  • Break in interview
  • Criminal-law
  • Police-procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.