Jersey Judgment

Newtel Ltd. v Devaney [2013] 2 JLR 339 (26 September 2013)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The chairman must recuse herself if her husband is a partner in a firm instructed by a party to the case, as this creates a real possibility of bias due to a direct financial interest.

Court disposition

recusal ordered

Orders

  • Chairman to recuse herself from the case
  • Additional deputy to be appointed to hear the claim

02

Material facts

Parties

Newtel Ltd.

Applicant

Devaney

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Employment Tribunal / Recusal Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the tribunal chairman should recuse herself due to apparent bias arising from her husband's partnership in a firm instructed by a party to the case

Party arguments

Applicant
The chairman should recuse herself because her husband is a partner in a firm instructed by a party, creating a real possibility of bias.
Respondent
If the chairman's husband has a direct financial interest, the party is effectively paying the chairman, necessitating recusal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    apparent bias test

    A fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude there is a real possibility of bias if the chairman's husband is a partner in a firm instructed by a party to the case.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The chairman must recuse herself if her husband is a partner in a firm instructed by a party to the case, as this creates a real possibility of bias due to a direct financial interest.

Obiter and limits

  • If no one is available to hear the case, an additional deputy should be appointed, even if this causes unfortunate delay in hearing the claim.

Court disposition

recusal ordered

  • Chairman to recuse herself from the case
  • Additional deputy to be appointed to hear the claim

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2013] 2 JLR 339

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Newtel Ltd. v Devaney [2013] 2 JLR 339 (26 September 2013) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2013/JLR132339.html Cite as: [2013] 2 JLR 339 [ New search ] [ Help ] Newtel Ltd. v Devaney 2013 (2) JLR 339 (26 September 2013) Employment-Employment Tribunal-apparent bias-test-whether fair-minded and informed observer, having considered facts, would conclude real possibility of bias-chairman to recuse herself if husband is partner of firm instructed by party to case before tribunal-as husband has direct financial interest in case, party effectively paying chairman-if no one available to hear case (deputy chairman having already recused herself), additional deputy to be appointed-unfortunate delay in hearing claim The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2013 (2) JLR 339 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2013/JLR132339.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.