Jersey Judgment

P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 15 (10 January 2003)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

There is no appeal against the Royal Court's refusal to order a case stated under the 1961 Law, as the decision is final by virtue of art. 12(2).

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed; no right of appeal exists.

02

Material facts

Parties

P. E. C.

Applicant

Lesquende Ltd.

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Planning Law Compulsory Purchase / Application for Case Stated; Appeal Against Refusal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether there is a right of appeal against the Royal Court's refusal to order a case stated under the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought to appeal the Royal Court's refusal to order a case stated regarding the settlement of price by arbitration under the 1961 Law.
Respondent
Respondent contended that the decision of the Royal Court on a case stated is final under art. 12(2) of the 1961 Law and not appealable.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961, art. 12(2)

    The decision of the Royal Court on a case stated under the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961 is final and not subject to appeal.

  2. 02

    Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961

    The policy of the 1961 Law is to provide a quick and effective remedy in the Royal Court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

There is no appeal against the Royal Court's refusal to order a case stated under the 1961 Law, as the decision is final by virtue of art. 12(2).

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed; no right of appeal exists.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2003] JLR 15

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 15 (10 January 2003) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2003/JLR030015.html Cite as: [2003] JLR 15 [ New search ] [ Help ] P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. 2003 JLR 15 (10 January 2003) Planning Law-compulsory purchase-settlement of price by arbitration-case stated-no appeal against Royal Court's refusal to order case stated under Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961, as decision on case stated final by art. 12(2)-policy of 1961 Law to provide quick and effective remedy in Royal Court The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2003 JLR 15 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2003/JLR030015.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.