Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Neville v Bray and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Mowschenson : Planning) [2025] JRC 139 (23 May 2025)
The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a misfeasance in public office claim arising from planning enforcement and prosecution over unauthorized window replacements.
Heath v Minister for the Environment [2023] JRC 196 (23 October 2023)
The Royal Court held that the planning appeal time limit ran from the date of the Minister’s determination, not notification, and refused an extension of time.
Fauvel v Minister for Environment [2023] JRC 193 (21 October 2023)
The Royal Court allowed a planning appeal in part, finding the Minister gave inadequate reasons for departing from an inspector’s recommendation on solar panels.
Brigham Young, Sovereign Hire Cars v Minister for Environment [2023] JRC 147 (14 August 2023)
The Royal Court dismissed a planning appeal over a proposed car park in St Helier, holding that the scheme was a change of use and not irrationally refused.
Heath v Minister for Infrastructure, Housing and Environment 29-Jun_2023 [2023] JRC 108 (29 June 2023)
The Royal Court refused leave for judicial review of a planning decision, finding no procedural unfairness and holding that an alternative appeal route was available.
W. E. (Jersey) Limited v Minister for the Environment [2022] JRC 160 (08 August 2022)
The Royal Court set aside the Minister’s call-in of planning applications for a public inquiry, holding that the reasons did not satisfy Article 12(1)(a) of the Planning Law.
WE (Jersey) Limited v Minister for Environment [2022] JRC 044 (18 February 2022)
The Royal Court granted WE (Jersey) Limited leave to seek judicial review of a ministerial decision calling planning applications in for public inquiry.
Sutton v The Connetable of St Brelade [2021] JRC 173 (15 June 2021)
Interim mandatory relief was refused in a judicial review over kiosk trading and a parish car park, because the balance of convenience favoured allowing development to continue.
Richardson v The Minister for the Environment and James 04-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 232 (04 November 2020)
The court allowed a late third-party planning appeal after the department failed to notify the objector of the grant of permission and the appellant acted promptly once aware.
Richardson v The Minister for the Environment and James 04-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 232A (04 November 2020)
The Royal Court held it had jurisdiction to award costs in a planning appeal out of time, but exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs.
Explore more
