Rosemary Hull v A C Mauger & Son Ltd
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Claim / Judgment in Default
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Because the Respondent did not defend the proceedings, the Tribunal entered judgment in default and awarded the Claimant the amounts claimed and supported by the Claim Form.
Court disposition
Judgment in default for the Claimant.
Orders
- The Respondent must pay the Claimant compensation and damages.
- Compensation for unfair dismissal: £45,648.
- Damages for no notice pay: £20,288.00.
- Damages for holiday pay: £3,296.80.
- Damages for unpaid wages: £2,536.00.
02
Material facts
Parties
ROSEMARY HULL
ClaimantA C MAUGER & SON LTD
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Compensation for Unfair Dismissal: GBP 45,648
- Damages for No Notice Pay: GBP 20,288
- Damages for Holiday Pay: GBP 3,296.8
- Damages for Unpaid Wages: GBP 2,536
03
Procedural history
Posture
Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Claim / Judgment in Default
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the undefended claims entitled the Claimant to judgment in default.
- 02
What sums were payable for unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay, and unpaid wages.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Claimant submitted a Claim Form seeking unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages after her employment ended without notice and process when the Respondent ceased trading.
- Respondent
- The joint liquidators indicated that they did not intend to defend the proceedings.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Article 12 of the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2016
As the claims are undefended, the Claimant is entitled to judgment in default under Article 12 of the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2016.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Because the Respondent did not defend the proceedings, the Tribunal entered judgment in default and awarded the Claimant the amounts claimed and supported by the Claim Form.
Court disposition
Judgment in default for the Claimant.
- The Respondent must pay the Claimant compensation and damages.
- Compensation for unfair dismissal: £45,648.
- Damages for no notice pay: £20,288.00.
- Damages for holiday pay: £3,296.80.
- Damages for unpaid wages: £2,536.00.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
IN THE JERSEY EMPLOYMENT
AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN
ROSEMARY HULL
CLAIMANT AND A C MAUGER & SON LTD
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT Reference: [2025] TRE 194 Before: Advocate Dr E Moran, Chairman Decision The Respondent must pay the Claimant compensation and damages in the sums out in the judgment. Reasons 1. The Claimant worked for the Respondent as an Accounts Administrator for more than 40 years. Her employment was terminated on 14 August 2025 without notice and process when the Respondent ceased trading.
2. On 17 September 2025 she submitted a Claim Form to the Tribunal claiming unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages. The Claim Form was sent to the joint liquidators of the Respondent who have indicated that they do not intend to defend the proceedings.
3. As the claims are undefended, the Claimant is entitled to judgment in default under Article 12 of the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2016.
4. Based on the information contained in the Claim Form I award the Claimant the following sums: - a. Compensation for unfair dismissal in the sum of £45,648. b. Damages for no notice pay in the sum of £20,288.00. c. Damages for holiday pay in the sum of £3,296.80. d. Damages for unpaid wages in the sum of £2,536.00. Advocate Dr E Moran, Chairman Dated: 29 October 2025
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.