Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Agriculture [2014] 2 JLR 487

Classic Herd v. Milk Mktg. Bd.

Classic Herd v. Milk Mktg. Bd. [2014] 2 JLR 487 (11 November 2014)

The court treated the producer’s claim against the Milk Marketing Board as a tort claim for breach of statutory duty, not a contract claim, and applied a 3-year limitation period.

  • Breach of statutory duty
  • Limitation period
  • Milk marketing schemes
  • Breach-of-statutory-duty
  • Limitation-period
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Agriculture

Classic Herd Ltd. v Jersey Milk Marketing Bd.

Classic Herd Ltd. v Jersey Milk Marketing Bd. [2014] 2 JLR_Note 4 (10 June 2014)

A Jersey agriculture case concerning the validity and application of a milk marketing scheme affecting the applicant’s business.

  • Marketing schemes
  • Milk regulation
  • Agriculture
  • Commercial
  • Milk-regulation
  • Marketing-schemes
Read case analysis
Agriculture [2005] JLR 513

Jersey Produce v States of Jersey

Jersey Produce v States of Jersey [2005] JLR 513 (08 November 2005)

The court held that the Jersey Potato Export Marketing Scheme 2001 was precluded because it restricted exports and treated domestic and export trade differently.

  • Marketing schemes
  • Export restrictions
  • Ec treaty
  • Protocol no. 3
  • Export-restrictions
  • Agricultural-marketing
Read case analysis
Agriculture [1985] JLR 433

Potato Mktg. Bd. v Rolland

Potato Mktg. Bd. v Rolland [1985] JLR 433 (14 October 1986)

The court held that the Maincrop Potato Marketing Scheme was not confined to harvested potatoes and could apply to sales made in a grower’s restaurant.

  • Marketing schemes
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Potato sales
  • Statutory-interpretation
  • Agriculture-law
  • Marketing-schemes
Read case analysis
Agriculture [1971] JJ 1819

Jersey Maincrop Mktg. Bd. v De Gruchy

Jersey Maincrop Mktg. Bd. v De Gruchy [1971] JJ 1819 (23 August 1971)

The court held that separate offences under an agriculture marketing scheme must be charged separately. A single broad charge without detail was inadequate.

  • Marketing schemes
  • Charging of offences
  • Procedural fairness
  • Charging-of-offences
  • Procedural-fairness
  • Agriculture-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.