Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

Jakob Mahoney v The Attorney General

The Royal Court refused Jakob Mahoney’s application to extend time to appeal his sentence and convictions, finding no realistic prospect of success.

  • Extension of time
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Appeal against conviction after guilty plea
  • Guilty plea
  • Assault
  • Drug possession
Read case analysis
Trusts [2025] JRC 247

Representation of V Trustees Limited Re N Trust (Royal Court : Hearing

Representation of V Trustees Limited Re N Trust (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Thompson : Costs) [2025] JRC 247 (6 October 2025)

The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against a costs judgment in a trustee blessing case, holding there was no realistic prospect of success.

  • Trustee indemnity
  • Court blessing of trustee decisions
  • Costs orders
  • Leave to appeal
  • Exercise of discretion
  • Disclosure obligations
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Bates v Weston

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to set aside registration of an English costs judgment, rejecting fraud, public policy and stay arguments.

  • Reciprocal enforcement of judgments
  • Set-aside registration grounds
  • Public policy
  • Fraud
  • Vested rights in judgment
  • Stay of enforcement
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2015] JCA 180

Home Farm Development and Ors -v- Le Sueur

Home Farm Development and Ors -v- Le Sueur [2015] JCA 180 (01 September 2015)

Appeal court refused security for costs in an interlocutory appeal, holding that impecuniosity alone was not enough and the balance favoured allowing the appeal to proceed.

  • Security for costs
  • Strike out applications
  • Access to justice
  • Impecuniosity
  • Summary disposal
  • Security-for-costs
Read case analysis
Insolvency [2014] JRC 063

Viscount of the Royal Court -v- Pitman

Viscount of the Royal Court -v- Pitman [2014] JRC 063 (12 March 2014)

The Royal Court held that a bare right of appeal is not separate property and that a defamation claim is a personal claim that did not vest in the Viscount.

  • Vesting of property in bankruptcy
  • Personal claims in insolvency
  • Right of appeal
  • Directions to viscount
  • Standing of creditors
  • Insolvency
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.