Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG v Pearce [2023] JRC 199 (26 October 2023)
The Royal Court granted a confiscation order after finding Darius Pearce benefited from money laundering conduct and rejecting his claim that JOT shares were held on trust.
The Royal Court sentenced Darius James Pearce to 7½ years for three money laundering counts linked to a commercial drug enterprise, and adjourned confiscation proceedings.
AG v Manning [2018] JRC 230 (12 December 2018)
A Jersey solicitor was sentenced for fraudulent conversion and a money-laundering offence committed in breach of trust. The Royal Court imposed 3½ years' imprisonment concurrent, with 8 months concurrent on the laundering count.
AG -v- Windward Trading Limited [2016] JRC 048A (24 February 2016)
The Jersey Royal Court made confiscation orders against a company that pleaded guilty to money laundering, finding it had benefitted from criminal conduct.
Barclays Wealth Directors (Jersey) Ltd and Barclays Wealth Corporate -v- AG [2015] JRC 230 (16 November 2015)
The Jersey Royal Court adjourned an application about funding Windward Trading Limited’s defence, directing a formal legal aid approach and considering use of seized assets only if necessary.
AG -v- Bhojwani [2008] JCA 188 (06 November 2008)
The Court of Appeal held that misconduct in a public office is an offence known to Jersey customary law and that Article 34(1) of the 1999 Law has a subjective purpose element.
AG v Bhojwani [2008] JRC 130 (12 August 2008)
The Jersey Royal Court held that misconduct in public office is not a Jersey customary law offence, but the Article 34(1) purpose element is subjective.
Gichuru v Walbrook [2008] JRC 068 (25 April 2008)
The court discharged the Chief Officer from proceedings arising from an SAR freeze, holding the dispute was between the customer and the bank, with the customer bearing the burden of proof.
AG -v- Michel [2007] JRC 203 (19 October 2007)
Post-conviction confiscation proceedings in which the Royal Court of Jersey ordered Peter Michel to pay ÂŁ9,730,152, finding he benefited from money laundering.
The Court of Appeal held that anti-money-laundering identification procedures had to be maintained in proper working order for the relevant transaction, and dismissed the appeals.
Explore more
