Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2015] JRC 141

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd [2015] JRC 141 (29 June 2015)

The Royal Court discharged ex parte interim injunctions because they were obtained without notice and on inadequate disclosure, then refused to re-impose them.

  • Ex parte injunctions
  • Duty of full and frank disclosure
  • Balance of convenience
  • Adequacy of damages
  • Ex-parte-injunctions
  • Full-and-frank-disclosure
Read case analysis
Equity [2009] JRC 139

Chilukuri and Others -v- RS Holdings Limited and Others

Chilukuri and Others -v- RS Holdings Limited and Others [2009] JRC 139 (14 July 2009)

The Jersey Royal Court refused to discharge interim injunctions preserving shares and related rights in a disputed hotel development, finding a serious issue to try.

  • Interim injunctions
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Conspiracy
  • Shareholder disputes
  • Remedies
  • Adequacy of damages
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2002] JRC 140

JPMO v States and JPEMB

JPMO v States and JPEMB [2002] JRC 140 (22 July 2002)

The Jersey Royal Court refused to lift a stay on the Jersey Potato Marketing Scheme, finding the balance of convenience favoured keeping the scheme on hold pending EC law issues.

  • Interim relief
  • Legality of statutory schemes
  • Balance of convenience
  • Adequacy of damages
  • Ec law compliance
  • Echr compliance
Read case analysis
Company law [2000] JRC 145A

Milner v Milner Laboratories

Milner v Milner Laboratories [2000] JRC 145A (24 July 2000)

The court set aside ex parte interim injunctions for lack of urgency and risk, then re-imposed narrower restraints by consent subject to a cross-undertaking in damages.

  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Ex parte injunctions
  • Shareholder protection
  • Adequacy of damages
  • Balance of convenience
  • Ex-parte-injunctions
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [1998] UR 93

1998/93 - Dollar Land (Manhattan) Ltd v Channel Hotels & Properties Ltd

1998/93 - Dollar Land (Manhattan) Ltd v Channel Hotels & Properties Ltd [1998] UR 93 (1 May 1998)

The court discharged an ex parte injunction after finding no enforceable contract, inadequate disclosure, and that damages would have been an adequate remedy.

  • Ex parte injunctions
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Adequacy of damages
  • Balance of convenience
  • Existence of contract
  • Ex-parte-injunctions
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.