Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Patel v JTC Trust Company Limited and Ors [2024] JRC 100 (25 April 2024)
The court granted leave for the parties to jointly instruct a handwriting expert on a disputed will, finding the issue necessary and proportionate to resolve.
AG v Canavan [2024] JRC 060 (15 March 2024)
The Royal Court admitted a late expert report explaining coded text and Facebook messages as drug-related, finding no real prejudice to the defendant.
Corbin v Doryneck and Anor [2022] JRC 057 (02 March 2022)
The Jersey Royal Court refused to admit a deceased expert’s reports because doing so would breach an order limiting each party to one seamanship expert.
N v M (Family) 4-Dec-2020 [2020] JRC 252A (04 December 2020)
The court upheld refusal of a father's expert report on Muslims in Country 1, preferring affidavit evidence to avoid delay, and found no apparent bias.
Smith -v- SWM Limited [2017] JRC 167 (11 October 2017)
The court refused summary judgment in a negligent investment advice claim and held the Grant Thornton and Duff and Phelps reports admissible, with weight for trial.
Neal -v- Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited [2017] JRC 083 (05 June 2017)
The Royal Court refused to admit a witness-of-fact accountant’s report as expert evidence, but allowed limited accounting expert evidence on loss assessment.
AG -v- F [2016] JRC 089E (22 April 2016)
The court refused defence expert evidence on repressed and recovered memory, allowing only a written explanation of infantile amnesia, and declined to require the prosecution expert for cross-examination.
AG -v- F [2016] JRC 079 (07 April 2016)
The court refused leave to admit expert evidence on memory reliability in a historic sexual abuse trial, finding the complainant’s account was not unusually detailed.
Doraville Properties Corporation -v- AG [2016] JRC 060A (11 March 2016)
The Royal Court ruled that parts of the applicant’s expert evidence on US law were inadmissible because they crossed into issues for the court to decide.
in the matter of Freddie and Arthur (No 2) (Care order) [2015] JRC 101 (13 May 2015)
The court refused to appoint a polygraph expert in care proceedings, holding that credibility of ordinary adult witnesses is for the tribunal, and delay would harm the children.
Explore more
