Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal-law

Jakob Mahoney v The Attorney General

The Royal Court refused Jakob Mahoney’s application to extend time to appeal his sentence and convictions, finding no realistic prospect of success.

  • Extension-of-time
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Appeal-against-conviction-after-guilty-plea
  • Guilty-plea
  • Assault
  • Drug-possession
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2026] JRC 098

Mahoney v AG (Royal Court : Hearing

Mahoney v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Temple) [2026] JRC 098 (16 April 2026)

The Royal Court refused an extension of time to appeal conviction and sentence, finding minimal merit in the proposed appeal and no exceptional grounds after guilty pleas.

  • Extension-of-time-to-appeal
  • Appeal-against-conviction
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Guilty-plea
  • Magistrate's-court-guidelines
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2026] JRC 022

Da SIlva v AG (Royal Court : Hearing

Da SIlva v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Binnington) [2026] JRC 022 (21 January 2026)

The Royal Court set aside and then reimposed a 10-month sentence for grave and criminal assault, holding the Magistrate had wrongly treated sentencing policy as binding.

  • Sentencing-policy
  • Grave-and-criminal-assault
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Custodial-vs-non-custodial-sanctions
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Custodial-sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] JRC 324

James v AG (Royal Court : Appeal

James v AG (Royal Court : Appeal (Criminal) : Bailhache, W) [2025] JRC 324 (5 December 2025)

The Royal Court refused an out-of-time criminal appeal from a guilty plea for common assault, finding no arguable basis to challenge conviction or sentence.

  • Appeal-against-conviction
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Extension-of-time
  • Guilty-plea
  • Disclosure
  • Unlawful-arrest
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] JRC 224

Steenson v AG (Royal Court : Hearing

Steenson v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Le Cocq) [2025] JRC 224 (16 September 2025)

The Royal Court of Jersey dismissed David Samuel Steenson’s sentence appeal, holding that a seven-month prison term for drink driving and dangerous driving was not manifestly excessive.

  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Drink-driving
  • Dangerous-driving
  • Failing-to-stop-after-accident
  • Sentencing-guidelines
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2025] JCA 093

AG v Tremarco (Court of Appeal : Appeal

AG v Tremarco (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Criminal)) [2025] JCA 093 (4 April 2025)

The Jersey Court of Appeal allowed the Attorney General’s sentence reference, finding a community service order for repeated domestic violence and strangulation was unduly lenient.

  • Domestic-violence
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Unduly-lenient-sentence
  • Community-service-order
  • Custodial-sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2024] JRC 205

Gomes v AG

Gomes v AG [2024] JRC 205 (04 October 2024)

Appeal dismissed against a 6-month driving disqualification and ÂŁ2,000 fine for causing serious injury by careless driving. The court held the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

  • Careless-driving
  • Causing-serious-injury
  • Sentencing-guidelines
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Sentence-appeals
  • Driving-disqualification
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2023] JRC 207

Turner v AG

Turner v AG [2023] JRC 207 (07 November 2023)

The Royal Court dismissed a sentence appeal for careless driving, upholding a ÂŁ5,000 fine and 12-month disqualification as neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.

  • Careless-driving
  • Sentencing-guidelines
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Disqualification-from-driving
  • Fines
  • Sentence-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2022] JRC 142

Carys Ann Ingram v AG

Carys Ann Ingram v AG [2022] JRC 142 (29 June 2022)

Appeal against sentence for breaches of Jersey Covid-19 regulations partially succeeded; the fine for Regulation 8 was reduced to ÂŁ5,000, with the Regulation 4 fine left unchanged.

  • Covid-19-regulations
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal-against-sentence
  • Sentencing-appeal
  • Public-health-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2019] JRC 244A

Leigh v AG

Leigh v AG [2019] JRC 244A (18 December 2019)

The court corrected sentencing miscalculations in an indecent images case but upheld the sentence, confirming that 100 or more images at any level is aggravating.

  • Sentencing
  • Child-protection
  • Indecent-images
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Appeal-against-sentence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.