Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Dresser-Rand BV v Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company and Ors [2021] JRC 321 (21 December 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court held it had jurisdiction to order disclosure of Jersey assets against a foreign defendant, but adjourned any worldwide disclosure order pending further evidence.
BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited v de Bourbon des Deux Siciles 22-Dec-2020 [2020] JRC 267 (22 December 2020)
The Royal Court held that Camilla had not purged her contempt for failing to comply with disclosure orders on trust assets, artworks, and portfolio proceeds.
In the matter of The Probank Entities [2020] JRC 105 (04 June 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court recognised a Brazilian judicial administrator and granted targeted assistance to trace and control assets linked to the Probank insolvency.
BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation v Siciles C. de Bourbon des Deux 07-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 199 (07 October 2019)
The Jersey Royal Court found Camilla in contempt for failing to pay two costs orders and for incomplete disclosure about assets and artwork linked to Mme Crociani.
Riba Consultaria Empresarial Ltda v Pinnacle Trustees Limited [2018] JRC 033A (12 February 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted Norwich Pharmacal relief, holding there was reasonable suspicion that Pinnacle was innocently mixed up in asset concealment.
Dalemont -v- Senatorov [2012] JRC 061A (21 March 2012)
The Jersey Royal Court found the First, Second and Fourth Defendants in contempt for inadequate compliance with disclosure orders, and granted 28 days to comply.
Africa Edge Sarl v Incat and Others [2008] JRC 175 (10 October 2008)
The court refused an ex parte worldwide freezing order, but allowed worldwide disclosure and a limited injunction concerning Guernsey trust interests.
UCC -v- Bender 15-Sept-2006 [2006] JRC 130 (15 September 2006)
The Royal Court found Mr Bender in contempt for wilfully breaching a disclosure injunction tied to a Mareva order and froze his right to defend further.
In re Esteem Settlement v [2002] JLR 243 (12 March 2002)
The court held that interest earned on a loan of an asset transferred in fraud of creditors is recoverable as the fruit of that asset under a Pauline action.
1999/106 - Giles v Forrest [1999] UR 106 (11 June 1999)
The court held there was sufficient basis for a désastre against Michael Forrest, despite one known creditor and disputed assets, but adjourned for three weeks.
Explore more
