Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Booth v The Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Civil) : Bailhache, W, Wolffe, Matthews : Desastre) [2025] JCA 126 (16 May 2025)
Court of Appeal of Jersey held that the Viscount was not obliged to return an unrealised claim to a discharged debtor and dismissed the appeal.
Halabi v Farrow and Ors [2023] JRC 251 (13 December 2023)
Interlocutory decision on a further-information application, requiring the plaintiff to particularise allegations of fiduciary breach, dishonesty, and assignment.
Booth v Viscount [2023] JRC 055 (12 April 2023)
The Royal Court refused to strike out Mr Booth’s claim over the Viscount’s refusal to reassign a 2013 King's Oak valuation claim, but required fuller particulars.
Kinstellar LLC v Eagle Properties (No 14) Limited [2020] JRC 117 (18 June 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court allowed third-party service out, ordered payment into court of the costs award, refused security for enforcement costs, and declined a stay.
Booth -v- The Viscount [2016] JCA 218 (24 November 2016)
The Jersey Court of Appeal held that the Code of 1771 did not bar return of litigation claims to a debtor in désastre, and the Viscount’s refusal was unreasonable.
In re Booth (No. 2) [2016] 2 JLR 473 (24 November 2016)
Bankruptcy assignment case on whether the Viscount could assign ongoing claims to the debtor despite the Code of 1771 restriction on matters in dispute.
Booth -v- Viscount (En desastre) [2016] JRC 086 (19 April 2016)
The Royal Court upheld the Viscount’s refusal to pursue or assign three litigation claims in a désastre, holding the decisions were reasonable and assignment was barred by the Code of 1771.
In re Booth (No. 2) [2016] 1 JLR_Note 20 (19 April 2016)
A Jersey bankruptcy note holding that claims in a désastre may be assigned.
Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International -v- HRCKY Ltd [2015] JRC 117 (28 May 2015)
The Jersey Royal Court partly allowed a defendant’s application to amend pleadings in a franchise dispute, permitting some good-faith, dol, and assignment claims but refusing others.
Leeds United Football Club Ltd- -Weston and Levi [2014] JRC 166 (05 September 2014)
The Royal Court of Jersey ordered Leeds to pay the defendants’ costs on the standard basis after Leeds’ claim failed and a forum challenge was not unreasonably delayed.
Explore more
