Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Representations of Wright and Knowles re Yeowart [2022] JRC 242 (08 November 2022)
The Jersey court recognised English bankruptcy trustees and authorised them to gather information and assets in Jersey under Article 49 of the 1990 Law.
Representation of Defty and Oprey [2021] JRC 225 (16 July 2021)
Jersey’s Royal Court recognised UK joint bankruptcy trustees and authorised them to investigate and collect the debtor’s Jersey assets, subject to notice to local creditors.
Representation of Matthew David Smith and Ors -19-Feb-2021 [2021] JRC 047 (19 February 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court recognised English administrators over Arcadia Group companies, granted trading powers in Jersey, and imposed a moratorium against creditor action.
Representation of Wright and Massey re Monsoon Accessorize Ltd and Accessorize Ltd [2020] JRC 199 (30 September 2020)
The Royal Court of Jersey recognised English joint administrators of Monsoon and Accessorize and authorised them to act in Jersey to complete the restructuring.
Rep re Estates and General Development Ltd [2013] JRC 027 (04 February 2013)
The Jersey Royal Court recognised English fixed charge receivers and authorised them to manage and sell Jersey immovable property under Article 49 of the Bankruptcy (DĂ©sastre)(Jersey) Law 1990.
The C Trust [2010] JRC 001 (04 January 2010)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to assist the English High Court under a Letter of Request, holding that disclosure would undermine confidential Article 51 trust proceedings.
In re Kaminski v [1990] JLR_Note 15c (26 March 1985)
A Jersey case note on assistance to a foreign court, addressing whether advance notice of questions should be given before information is sought.
Hotel Beau Rivage v Careves Invs. [1985] JLR 70 (28 January 1985)
The court refused an application for a receiver, holding that receivership is not generally recognised in Jersey law and that any appointment of the Viscount was limited to assistance to an English court.
Explore more
