Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Abramovich v Chief Minister of Jersey and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin) [2025] JRC 308 (21 November 2025)
The Royal Court granted summary judgment on the GOJ Defendants’ failure to meet DSAR time limits under the Data Protection (Jersey) Law, but left damages for trial.
Hughes -v- Minister for Economic Development [2015] JRC 058A (20 March 2015)
Leave to appeal was refused in a harbour-fees dispute over a vessel sold by auction. The court held the claim was prescribed and no empêchement de fait applied.
Neal -v- Kelleher [2014] JRC 233 (27 November 2014)
The court held that curator claims were subject to a three-year limitation period, but time did not run while the interdict remained under empêchement de droit.
Classic Herd v. Milk Mktg. Bd. [2014] 2 JLR 487 (11 November 2014)
The court treated the producer’s claim against the Milk Marketing Board as a tort claim for breach of statutory duty, not a contract claim, and applied a 3-year limitation period.
Classic Herd Ltd -v- Jersey Milk Marketing Board [2014] JRC 217 (11 November 2014)
The Jersey Royal Court held that Classic Herd’s claims were prescribed as breach of statutory duty claims, dismissed the appeal, allowed the cross-appeal, and struck out the order of justice.
Classic Herd Limited -v- Jersey Milk Marketing Board [2014] JRC 127 (10 June 2014)
Strike out application over milk marketing and competition claims. The court held two heads of claim were time-barred tort claims, but one payment claim was contractual and could proceed.
Att. Gen. v Alfa Ground Works [2013] 2 JLR 458 (19 November 2013)
The Attorney General was granted leave to proceed against a company in liquidation for health and safety breaches, the court finding it served the public interest.
Mullaney v Brenwal Limited [2012] JRC 091 (08 May 2012)
The court rejected Brenwal’s contributory negligence defence in a trench-collapse injury claim, holding that the employer’s failure to shore the trench was the primary cause.
Att. Gen. v R. & M. Sprinkler Installations Ltd. [2011] JLR_Note 30 (15 July 2011)
The court found that R. & M. Sprinkler Installations Ltd. breached statutory workplace safety duties and imposed a fine.
Syvret v Chief Minister and Others [2011] JRC 116 (20 June 2011)
The Royal Court struck out Mr Syvret’s claim as disclosing no cause of action and refused his recusal application, finding no apparent bias.
Explore more
