Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal-law [2015] JRC 139

AG -v- Da Costa

AG -v- Da Costa [2015] JRC 139 (26 June 2015)

The court sentenced the defendant for obstruction of police, drug possession, and breaking and entry with larceny, and recommended deportation from Jersey.

  • Obstruction-of-police
  • Possession-of-controlled-drugs
  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Larceny
  • Sentencing
  • Deportation
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2015] JRC 072

AG -v- Ahier

AG -v- Ahier [2015] JRC 072 (13 April 2015)

Sentencing for repeat burglary-related offending, property damage, and drug possession resulted in a total of 4 years’ imprisonment plus forfeiture of the drugs.

  • Illegal-entry
  • Larceny
  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Malicious-damage
  • Possession-of-controlled-drugs
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2014] JRC 029

AG -v- Lynn

AG -v- Lynn [2014] JRC 029 (31 January 2014)

Sentencing decision for breaking and entry and larceny involving stolen motorcycles and equipment worth over ÂŁ72,000, with planning and court-order breach treated as aggravating.

  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Larceny
  • Sentencing
  • Aggravating-factors
  • Mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2012] JRC 133A

AG -v- Cooper and G

AG -v- Cooper and G [2012] JRC 133A (06 July 2012)

The court sentenced Cooper to 30 months' imprisonment and G to 10 months' youth detention for repeat offending, breach of probation, and related drug and motoring offences.

  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Larceny
  • Motoring-offences
  • Probation-breach
  • Youth-detention
  • Drug-possession
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2010] JRC 236

AG -v- Rawlinson

AG -v- Rawlinson [2010] JRC 236 (22 December 2010)

The Jersey Royal Court sentenced a young offender for multiple breaking and entry and larceny counts, imposing community service and 12 months’ probation instead of custody.

  • Sentencing
  • Community-service
  • Probation
  • Young-offenders
  • Breaking-and-entering
  • Larceny
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2010] JRC 065

AG -v- Hartley and Others

AG -v- Hartley and Others [2010] JRC 065 (26 March 2010)

Sentencing judgment for young defendants convicted of multiple theft-related offences. The court imposed substantial community service and probation instead of custody.

  • Larceny
  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Illegal-entry
  • Sentencing
  • Community-service
  • Probation
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2009] JRC 045

AG -v- Cowling and Cowling

AG -v- Cowling and Cowling [2009] JRC 045 (12 March 2009)

Sentencing judgment for two young defendants convicted of numerous dishonesty, driving and drug offences, where the court imposed custodial youth detention despite mitigation.

  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Larceny
  • Common-assault
  • Obstruction-of-police-officer
  • Driving-offences
  • Possession-of-cannabis
Read case analysis
Criminal-law

The Attorney General v Artur Adam Pinkowski

Sentencing after guilty pleas for multiple daylight break-ins and attempted break-ins. The Royal Court imposed 3 years' imprisonment and recommended deportation.

  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Attempted-breaking-and-entry
  • Larceny
  • Non-custodial-mitigation
  • Risk-of-reoffending
  • Deportation-recommendation
Read case analysis
Criminal-law [2007] JRC 089

AG -v- Prior

AG -v- Prior [2007] JRC 089 (27 April 2007)

Sentencing for breaking and entry, drug possession, and probation breach. Despite serious offending and criminal history, the court imposed probation with treatment and community service.

  • Breaking-and-entry
  • Possession-of-controlled-drugs
  • Sentencing
  • Probation
  • Community-service
  • Treatment-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.