Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Alan Geoffrey Falle

The Royal Court sentenced a teacher for 12 counts of abuse of trust by sexual act against a 17-year-old pupil, imposing 3 years and 4 months’ imprisonment.

  • Sentencing
  • Sexual offences
  • Abuse of trust
  • Teacher-pupil relationship
  • Guilty plea discount
  • Concurrent sentences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] JRC 267

AG v Richomme (Royal Court : Hearing

AG v Richomme (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : Le Cocq) [2025] JRC 267 (17 October 2025)

The Royal Court sentenced Andrew James Richomme to a total of 12 months' imprisonment for burglary, larceny, and motoring offences, ordering the sentences to run concurrently.

  • Breaking and entering
  • Larceny
  • Taking vehicle without consent
  • Driving without licence
  • Driving without insurance
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Cedric Joel Conord

The Royal Court sentenced Cedric Joel Conord for importing cocaine and heroin, rejecting a social-supply account and imposing concurrent terms of 6 and 6½ years.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Cocaine
  • Heroin
  • Class a drugs
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Forfeiture and destruction
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] JRC 027

AG v Taylor

AG v Taylor [2019] JRC 027 (19 February 2019)

The Royal Court of Jersey held that Article 8 sentencing guidelines can apply to Article 5(c) drug-supply offences where the conduct would also fit possession with intent to supply.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigation
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Drug-offences
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] JRC 046

AG v Barratt

AG v Barratt [2017] JRC 046 (20 March 2017)

Sentencing for importation of large quantities of MDMA tablets, MDMA crystal and cannabis resin into Jersey. The court imposed concurrent prison terms after allowing mitigation and a guilty plea.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigation
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Forfeiture
  • Drug-importation
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Neil Martin Coleman

The Royal Court sentenced Neil Martin Coleman for two counts of malicious damage, imposing concurrent community service orders and noting custody would otherwise have been warranted.

  • Malicious damage
  • Community service order
  • Guilty plea
  • Good character
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Malicious-damage
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] JRC 176

AG -v- O'Brien

AG -v- O'Brien [2011] JRC 176 (09 September 2011)

The Jersey Royal Court sentenced the defendant to 3 years’ imprisonment for multiple offences, ordering some counts concurrently and others consecutively, plus driving disqualification and drug forfeiture.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigation
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Consecutive sentences
  • Driving offences
  • Forfeiture
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v David Lindsay Markland Clegg

Sentencing after guilty pleas for knowing involvement in importing cocaine and cannabis resin. The Royal Court imposed concurrent 15-month sentences and ordered forfeiture and destruction.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Cocaine
  • Cannabis resin
  • Guilty plea mitigation
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Forfeiture and destruction of drugs
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2008] JCA 010

De Jesus v AG

De Jesus v AG [2008] JCA 010 (23 January 2008)

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against an eight-year youth detention sentence and a recommendation for deportation in a heroin importation case.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Deportation
  • Article 8 echr
  • Mitigation
  • Concurrent sentences
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.