Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
XY and A Limited v The Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police [2023] JRC 020 (23 January 2023)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that a consent order for costs covered only costs up to 9 November 2022. Each party bears its own costs after that date.
H v J (Matrimonial) 31-Mar-21 [2021] JRC 106 (31 March 2021)
The Registrar refused to approve a draft consent order in matrimonial proceedings because it was inherently unfair, with no adequate capital or pension compensation for the wife.
Morelli v Morelli 17-Sep-2019 [2019] JRC 180 (17 September 2019)
The Royal Court of Jersey discharged the defendants’ undertakings under a 2016 consent order, holding the Monaco civil proceedings had been concluded.
C v D (Matrimonial) 19-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 159 (19 August 2019)
The court upheld a matrimonial ancillary relief agreement, finding no material non-disclosure about the petitioner’s widow’s pension and approving the clean-break settlement.
Bogensberger v Sinel and Sinel v Hennessy and Ors [2018] JRC 228 (11 December 2018)
The Royal Court varied a consent stay, refused consolidation, and ordered the representation trial to follow the injunctive trial before the same court.
Q -v- R (Matrimonial) [2017] JRC 123 (01 August 2017)
In a spousal maintenance review, the Royal Court refused disclosure about the respondent’s new wife’s income and certain bank transactions, finding them presently irrelevant.
Bisson -v- Minister for Transport and Technical Services [2015] JRC 084 (27 April 2015)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal against a consent order varying a PSV licence, finding no basis to interfere and treating the matter as spent.
X -v- Estate of Y (Deceased) and Axa Insurance UK plc [2014] JRC 203 (23 October 2014)
The Royal Court of Jersey approved a consent periodical payments order in a catastrophic personal injury case, holding it had inherent jurisdiction to do so.
Marett -v- Marett [2014] JRC 087A (02 April 2014)
The court struck out Jonathan Marett’s counterclaim and granted Stephen Marett summary judgment for possession of the property, leaving damages for later determination.
Y -v- Z (Family) [2014] JRC 055A (03 March 2014)
The Royal Court allowed a father’s appeal, setting aside a final child-contact order made at a case review hearing without formal evidence and remitting the matter.
Explore more
