Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Representation of A re the E Settlement [2022] JRC 052 (28 February 2022)
The Jersey Court set aside the E Settlement for mistake, finding the settlor misunderstood the risk that HMRC could revisit his domicile and tax position.
ESTATE OF THE LATE JUSTINE ANNE GARALDINE TREMLETT, RE [2021] JRC 294 (22 November 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court held that the deceased’s 2019 will revoked her 2016 will and directed probate of the 2019 will.
The Royal Court declared four Jersey trusts void for mistake after finding the settlor misunderstood the domicile risk and would not have settled them had he known the true tax exposure.
The Representation of Q re The R, S, T and U Trusts - [2021] JRC 166 (10 June 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court set aside four trusts for mistake, holding the settlor acted on a mistaken view of UK domicile risk and resulting tax exposure.
In the matter of the B Trust [2019] JRC 035 (03 March 2019)
The Royal Court of Jersey held that transfers into a trust were voidable for mistake, but refused to remake the transfers to improve tax outcomes.
Representation of Hawksford Executors Ltd [2013] JRC 188 (27 September 2013)
The Jersey Royal Court held that the deceased’s Belgian will did not revoke her earlier world-wide will, and that English law governed the revocation issue.
Representation of Reid Will [2008] JRC 213 (10 December 2008)
The court held that the deceased remained domiciled in England and Wales, admitted a photocopy of the second will to probate, and found the Jersey estate was covered by that will.
F Representation v [2002] JRC 174 (25 September 2002)
The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a mother’s request for a declaration of custody, care and control of her illegitimate child, holding that Jersey law already vested those rights in her.
In re Lundquist v [1997] JLR_Note 4b (06 February 1997)
A Jersey Law Reports note on whether a domicile of choice had been abandoned, focusing on the common-law requirements for ending such domicile.
Knight v Elwell [1977] JLR 169 (21 September 1977)
In a custody dispute, the court considered the child’s financial disadvantage and held that joint custody could be proper if otherwise suitable.
Explore more
