Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law [2021] JRC 200

Durlo and Anor v Zuch

Durlo and Anor v Zuch [2021] JRC 200 (29 July 2021)

The Royal Court of Jersey refused summary judgment, holding that a generic email disclaimer did not clearly exclude liability for knowingly untrue replies to pre-contract enquiries.

  • Misrepresentation
  • Warranties
  • Pre-contractual enquiries
  • Summary judgment
  • Exclusion clauses
  • Pre-contract-enquiries
Read case analysis
Contract law [2018] JRC 102A

Mackie v Scott

Mackie v Scott [2018] JRC 102A (14 June 2018)

The Royal Court of Jersey held that a standard tout tel clause did not exclude liability for pre-contractual misrepresentation.

  • Misrepresentation
  • Interpretation of contractual clauses
  • Vices cachĂ©s
  • Conveyancing
  • Exclusion clauses
  • Contract-interpretation
Read case analysis
Contract law [2017] JRC 179

Mackie v Scott

Mackie v Scott [2017] JRC 179 (26 October 2017)

The Royal Court ordered a preliminary issue on whether a Jersey “tout tel” clause excludes liability for misrepresentation in a property sale.

  • Misrepresentation
  • Exclusion clauses
  • Sale of immovable property
  • Contractual interpretation
  • Exclusion-clauses
  • Sale-of-immovable-property
Read case analysis
Arbitration [2016] JRC 081A

Public of the Island of Jersey -v- Jersey Electricity Company

Public of the Island of Jersey -v- Jersey Electricity Company [2016] JRC 081A (13 April 2016)

The Jersey Royal Court held that leave to appeal was required for the exclusion-clause issue and granted leave, finding the point a legal question with special reasons for appeal.

  • Exclusion clauses
  • Leave to appeal
  • Arbitration awards
  • Arbitration
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Exclusion-clauses
Read case analysis
Contract law [2015] JRC 117

Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International -v- HRCKY Ltd

Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International -v- HRCKY Ltd [2015] JRC 117 (28 May 2015)

The Jersey Royal Court partly allowed a defendant’s application to amend pleadings in a franchise dispute, permitting some good-faith, dol, and assignment claims but refusing others.

  • Implied terms
  • Franchise agreements
  • Misrepresentation
  • Assignment of claims
  • Exclusion clauses
  • Good faith
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.