Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Royal Court refused most sexual-history questioning of a complainant under Article 43 and refused a defence application to discharge the jury and order a retrial.
AG v Anthony (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal)) [2025] JRC 021 (21 January 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey admitted a 999 call and initial body-cam statements as res gestae, but excluded later police-account evidence and bad character evidence.
AG v Roberts [2024] JRC 056 (07 March 2024)
The court allowed late-admitted photographs of the complainant’s injuries after finding they were relevant, admissible, and not unfairly prejudicial to the defence.
Crow v Fresh Dough Company Ltd and Anor [2024] JRC 012 (16 January 2024)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to strike out defences after a window was replaced and lost. The Master held there was no abuse of process and a fair trial remained possible.
Pender v GGH (Jersey) Limited and Ors [2022] JRC 122 (07 June 2022)
The court held that the plaintiff could rely on a disclosed Fox Williams email, found no obvious mistake barring use, and addressed whether fairness required further discovery.
Bonney v AG [2021] JRC 174 (17 June 2021)
The Royal Court of Jersey allowed an appeal against a magistrate’s refusal to recuse herself, finding apparent bias under the Porter v Magill test.
B v AG 18-Feb-2021 [2021] JRC 052 (18 February 2021)
The Royal Court allowed an appeal against refusal to vacate a guilty plea for common assault, holding the plea was not unequivocal and staying further prosecution.
AG v Murphy [2019] JRC 233 (05 December 2019)
The Royal Court admitted selected previous violent convictions to show propensity in a grave and criminal assault case, finding the evidence fair and relevant.
E -v- AG [2018] JRC 111 (27 June 2018)
Appeal against Youth Court conviction dismissed. The court held disclosure had been inadequate but not unfair, and upheld joinder and the conviction.
AG -v- Humble [2018] JRC 086 (14 May 2018)
The court refused to admit Complainant A’s 2013 statement, holding that reliance on it would be unfair to the defendant and would risk denying a fair trial.
Explore more
