Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2024] JRC 003

Hard Rock Limited and Anor v HRCKY Limited

Hard Rock Limited and Anor v HRCKY Limited [2024] JRC 003 (06 January 2024)

The Jersey Royal Court lifted a stay on enforcement of an interim payment, but barred insolvency steps against HRCKY or Mr Doyle to avoid stifling any appeal.

  • Stay of enforcement
  • Interim payments
  • Appeal prospects
  • Impecuniosity
  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Stay-of-enforcement
Read case analysis
Civil procedure

Booth v Viscount and Anor

The Royal Court ordered Mr Booth to pay half the defendants’ costs of a preliminary issue, but barred enforcement without the court’s leave.

  • Costs
  • Assignment of cause of action
  • Standing
  • Enforcement of costs order
  • Impecuniosity
  • Enforcement-of-costs-order
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2015] JCA 180

Home Farm Development and Ors -v- Le Sueur

Home Farm Development and Ors -v- Le Sueur [2015] JCA 180 (01 September 2015)

Appeal court refused security for costs in an interlocutory appeal, holding that impecuniosity alone was not enough and the balance favoured allowing the appeal to proceed.

  • Security for costs
  • Strike out applications
  • Access to justice
  • Impecuniosity
  • Summary disposal
  • Security-for-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2015] JRC 172

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd [2015] JRC 172 (20 August 2015)

The Royal Court refused security for costs against a resident plaintiff, finding the claims weak but not supported by special or unusual circumstances.

  • Security for costs
  • Exceptional circumstances
  • Impecuniosity
  • Access to justice
  • Case management
  • Security-for-costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [1999] UR 86

1999/86 - Veka v TA Picot and Ors

1999/86 - Veka v TA Picot and Ors [1999] UR 86 (21 May 1999)

The Court of Appeal in Jersey dismissed an application for security for costs in an appeal, finding no special circumstances to justify security against Mr. Picot.

  • Security for costs
  • Appeals
  • Impecuniosity
  • Security-for-costs
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.