Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Landlord-and-tenant [2022] JRC 212

Waterfront (LC) Limited v Cine UK Limited

Waterfront (LC) Limited v Cine UK Limited [2022] JRC 212 (11 October 2022)

The Royal Court granted summary judgment for the landlord, holding the tenant remained liable for rent and charges during COVID-19 closure and restriction periods.

  • Rent-arrears-during-covid-19-pandemic
  • Force-majeure-and-frustration
  • Implied-terms-in-leases
  • Government-covid-19-restrictions
  • Insurance-obligations-under-lease
  • Covid-19-rent-arrears
Read case analysis
Employment-law [2019] JRC 164

Sumera v Atlantique Seafood trading as Soy Sushi Restaurant 22-Aug-2019

Sumera v Atlantique Seafood trading as Soy Sushi Restaurant 22-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 164 (22 August 2019)

Leave to appeal was refused in an employment dispute over unpaid time off in lieu and wages. The court found no error of law in the tribunal’s factual findings.

  • Time-off-in-lieu
  • Unpaid-wages
  • Implied-terms
  • Termination-of-employment
  • Employment-appeals
Read case analysis
Contract-law [2019] JRC 054

Smith and Bracken-Smith v Jersey Oak Limited 01-04-2019

Smith and Bracken-Smith v Jersey Oak Limited 01-04-2019 [2019] JRC 054 (01 April 2019)

The Jersey Royal Court rejected claims that a commercial lease was void for misrepresentation or dol, and declined to cancel it despite some unauthorised works.

  • Lease-cancellation
  • Misrepresentation
  • Breach-of-lease
  • Implied-terms
  • Planning-law-compliance
  • Planning-compliance
Read case analysis
Commercial-law [2018] JRC 204

Solutus Advisors Ltd & Anor v Aurium Real Estate London Ultra Prima Ltd

Solutus Advisors Ltd & Anor v Aurium Real Estate London Ultra Prima Ltd [2018] JRC 204 (07 November 2018)

The Royal Court refused summary judgment over a disputed invoice, finding factual and legal issues needed a trial. It made conditional orders for security for costs and joinder of BRHL.

  • Summary-judgment
  • Security-interest
  • Implied-terms
  • Breach-of-contract
  • Conflict-of-interest
  • Security-for-costs
Read case analysis
Contract-law [2018] JRC 026

Hard Rock Limited v HRCKY Limited

Hard Rock Limited v HRCKY Limited [2018] JRC 026 (1 February 2018)

The Royal Court granted summary dismissal of a franchisee’s counter-claim, finding no real prospect of success on good faith, misrepresentation, or silence.

  • Implied-terms-of-good-faith
  • Fraudulent-misrepresentation-(dol)
  • Fraudulent-silence-(dol-par-rĂ©ticence)
  • Prescription-(limitation-of-actions)
  • Entire-agreement-clauses
  • Summary-judgment
Read case analysis
Landlord-and-tenant [2017] JCA 183

Hong Kong Foods Ltd -v- Robin Hood

Hong Kong Foods Ltd -v- Robin Hood [2017] JCA 183 (03 November 2017)

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Gibbons’ personal appeal and stayed the company appeal unless Hong Kong Foods is restored to the register.

  • Implied-terms
  • Breach-of-lease
  • Assignment-of-lease
  • Termination-of-lease
  • Misrepresentation
  • Landlord-and-tenant
Read case analysis
Civil-procedure [2016] JRC 157

Hard Rock Ltd and Another -v- HRCKY Limited

Hard Rock Ltd and Another -v- HRCKY Limited [2016] JRC 157 (09 September 2016)

The Royal Court granted specific discovery in part in a franchise dispute, ordering production of targeted financial, correspondence, and evaluation records but refusing broader requests.

  • Discovery
  • Franchise-agreements
  • Implied-terms
  • Misrepresentation
  • Specific-discovery
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Contract-law [2016] JRC 129

Hard Rock Ltd and Another -v- HRCKY Ltd

Hard Rock Ltd and Another -v- HRCKY Ltd [2016] JRC 129 (27 July 2016)

The Royal Court refused the defendant’s application to call a franchise expert, holding the issues of implied good faith, breach, and misrepresentation were within the court’s competence.

  • Franchise-agreements
  • Implied-terms
  • Good-faith
  • Expert-evidence
  • Misrepresentation
Read case analysis
Banking-and-finance [2016] JCA 115A

Tygres Gg Mayger -v- Genee Anor

Tygres Gg Mayger -v- Genee Anor [2016] JCA 115A (05 July 2016)

Leave to appeal was refused in proceedings over expired mortgage loans. The Court held there was no realistic defence, no basis for a stay, and no arguable FSO issue.

  • Mortgage-enforcement
  • Stay-of-proceedings
  • Financial-services-ombudsman-jurisdiction
  • Implied-contractual-terms
  • Duty-of-care-in-lending
  • Appeal-standards
Read case analysis
Contract-law [2015] JRC 117

Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International -v- HRCKY Ltd

Hard Rock Ltd and Hard Rock Cafe International -v- HRCKY Ltd [2015] JRC 117 (28 May 2015)

The Jersey Royal Court partly allowed a defendant’s application to amend pleadings in a franchise dispute, permitting some good-faith, dol, and assignment claims but refusing others.

  • Implied-terms
  • Franchise-agreements
  • Misrepresentation
  • Assignment-of-claims
  • Exclusion-clauses
  • Good-faith
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.