Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2021] JCA 164

Fernandes v AG

Fernandes v AG [2021] JCA 164 (07 June 2021)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for leave to appeal against a rape conviction, holding the jury had sufficient evidence and no inconsistent verdict error.

  • Rape
  • Consent
  • Intoxication
  • Reasonable belief
  • Jury directions
  • Inconsistent verdicts
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2020] JCA 164

Fernandes v AG 07-Jun-2021

Fernandes v AG 07-Jun-2021 [2020] JCA 164 (07 June 2021)

Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a rape conviction, holding there was sufficient evidence of non-consent and no miscarriage of justice.

  • Rape
  • Consent
  • Intoxication
  • Reasonable belief in consent
  • Jury directions
  • Inconsistent verdicts
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2013] JRC 106A

Gallichan -v- His Excellency The Lieutenant Governor

Gallichan -v- His Excellency The Lieutenant Governor [2013] JRC 106A (04 June 2013)

Judicial review of the Lieutenant-Governor’s refusal to refer an applicant’s conviction to the Jersey Court of Appeal was dismissed as lawful and reasonable.

  • Judicial review
  • Powers of lieutenant-governor
  • Referral of conviction
  • Inconsistent verdicts
  • Judicial-review
  • Criminal-appeals
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2013] 2 JLR 141

Gallichan v Lieutenant-Governor

Gallichan v Lieutenant-Governor [2013] 2 JLR 141 (04 June 2013)

The court held that the verdicts were not logically inconsistent and that the Lieutenant-Governor’s refusal to refer the case was not subject to judicial review.

  • Appeals against conviction
  • Inconsistent verdicts
  • Money laundering
  • Judicial review
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Inconsistent-verdicts
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2010] JCA 212

X v AG

X v AG [2010] JCA 212 (25 November 2010)

The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal except on abuse of process, holding that historic allegations could still be tried fairly and upholding conviction.

  • Historic sexual offences
  • Abuse of process
  • Cross-admissibility of evidence
  • Severance of indictment
  • Inconsistent verdicts
  • Appeal against conviction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.