Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
O'Hare v Burgher 04-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 065 (04 March 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court construed a settlement agreement as requiring the defendant to vacate a property within three months, granting summary judgment for the plaintiff.
Representation of G Finance Limited and HSBC International Trustee Limited Jersey Branch 03-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 230 (03 November 2020)
The Jersey Royal Court rectified a 2017 loan agreement to stop interest accruing from 6 April 2017, and construed later 2018 and 2019 agreements accordingly.
Trico Limited v Buckingham [2020] JCA 067 (11 May 2020)
The Court of Appeal held that the Side Letter was too uncertain to construe on summary judgment and that factual disputes required a trial.
Bateman v Angel Fish Limited [2018] JRC 177 (25 September 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey construed 1908 restrictive covenants on Bentcliffe, granting declarations on wall and roof height limits but refusing a broader height interpretation and any ruling on the proposed scheme.
Fogarty -v- St Martin's Cottage Limited [2016] JCA 180 (05 October 2016)
The Court of Appeal held that a boundary contract moved the boundary and, on the facts, destination de père de famille applied. Damages in lieu of removal were also upheld.
Minister for Infrastructure -v- Parish of St Helier [2016] JRC 153 (02 September 2016)
The Jersey Royal Court held that the Bellozanne covenants were tied to the existing destructors and had expired when they were dismantled, so refuse charges could be introduced.
La Petite Croatie Ltd -v- Ledo [2009] JRC 090 (29 April 2009)
The Royal Court held that a restrictive covenant over land south of Number 2 Pigneaux Farm did not extend to the cottage, so the plaintiff’s injunction claim failed.
Bespoke Investments v Lincoln Nominess [2005] JRC 019 (23 February 2005)
The court construed a share vending agreement for a country house sale, holding that functioning audio and CCTV systems and some chattels were promised, but dismissing the saddles claim.
Jersey Electricity Company v Brocken & Fitzpatrick [2004] JRC 132 (27 July 2004)
The Royal Court held that the contract did not wholly exclude tort liability, so the third party could still be a tortfeasor for contribution purposes.
1998/220 - Blampied representation [1998] UR 220 (4 November 1998)
The Jersey court refused to rectify restrictive covenants in Croydon Terrace contracts, but interpreted them as limited to the gardens of the properties conveyed.
Explore more
