Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Booth v Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey [2024] JRC 132 (12 June 2024)
The Royal Court refused Mr Booth’s application to require the Viscount to assign him a negligence claim over a 2013 King's Oak valuation.
The Royal Court refused Mr Booth’s challenge to the Viscount’s refusal to assign him a negligence claim over a 2013 King’s Oak valuation.
Emirates NBD Bank P.J.S.C. v Almakhawi and Ors [2023] JRC 243 (05 December 2023)
The Jersey Royal Court granted summary judgment recognising and enforcing a Dubai judgment, rejecting natural justice and public policy objections as having no realistic prospect.
Booth v Viscount [2023] JRC 055 (12 April 2023)
The Royal Court refused to strike out Mr Booth’s claim over the Viscount’s refusal to reassign a 2013 King's Oak valuation claim, but required fuller particulars.
W v X [2021] JRC 231 (16 September 2021)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to strike out references to a criminal conviction in a personal injury claim and declined to stay the civil case pending possible further criminal proceedings.
Alwitry v States Employment Board [2020] JRC 206 (08 October 2020)
The Royal Court refused the States Employment Board’s bid to limit Mr Alwitry’s damages to the date of an alleged breakdown in relations, holding the issue was already finally determined.
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against a strike-out order, holding the claims were prescribed or barred by issue estoppel and abuse of process.
Brakspear v Nedbank Trust (Jersey) Limited [2019] JCA 150 (30 July 2019)
Leave to appeal was refused in a trust dispute over the Westley Trust, with the Court of Appeal upholding strike-out on prescription and issue estoppel grounds.
Brakspear -v- Nedgroup Trust (Jersey) Limited [2018] JRC 121 (05 July 2018)
The Royal Court struck out a trust claim, holding the plaintiffs’ allegations were prescribed, insufficiently particularised as fraud, and barred by res judicata.
Dubai Islamic Bank PJSC v Ridley [2017] JRC 204 (05 December 2017)
Appeal partly allowed: Sharia-law defences and related issues were not suitable for strike out and had to go to trial; issue estoppel on fraud remained.
Explore more
