Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Neville v Bray and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Mowschenson : Planning) [2025] JRC 139 (23 May 2025)
The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a misfeasance in public office claim arising from planning enforcement and prosecution over unauthorized window replacements.
Brigham Young, Sovereign Hire Cars v Minister for Environment [2023] JRC 147 (14 August 2023)
The Royal Court dismissed a planning appeal over a proposed car park in St Helier, holding that the scheme was a change of use and not irrationally refused.
W. E. (Jersey) Limited v Minister for the Environment [2022] JRC 160 (08 August 2022)
The Royal Court set aside the Minister’s call-in of planning applications for a public inquiry, holding that the reasons did not satisfy Article 12(1)(a) of the Planning Law.
WE (Jersey) Limited v Minister for Environment [2022] JRC 044 (18 February 2022)
The Royal Court granted WE (Jersey) Limited leave to seek judicial review of a ministerial decision calling planning applications in for public inquiry.
Sutton v The Connetable of St Brelade [2021] JRC 173 (15 June 2021)
Interim mandatory relief was refused in a judicial review over kiosk trading and a parish car park, because the balance of convenience favoured allowing development to continue.
Shinzo (jersey) Limited v. Minister For The Environment [2020] 2 JLR_Note 6 (09 November 2020)
Judicial review concerning whether the Minister for the Environment lawfully dealt with planning permission under the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002.
Therin -v- Minister for Planning and Warwick [2018] JRC 098 (01 June 2018)
The Royal Court remitted a planning appeal for reconsideration, finding no error in heritage, landscape, biodiversity, or Article 6 analysis, but a failure to apply policy GD1 properly.
Whitworth -v- Minister for Planning and Environment [2015] JRC 189 (15 September 2015)
Third-party planning appeal allowed: the Royal Court held there was no sufficient justification to depart from Green Zone policy and quashed permission, except for a fence extension.
Bougeard -v- Minister for Planning and Environment [2015] JRC 176 (26 August 2015)
Third-party planning appeal over a Green Zone extension was dismissed. The court held the Minister’s grant of permission was not unreasonable.
Herold -v- Minister for Planning and Sea View Investments Ltd [2015] JRC 111 (21 May 2015)
The Royal Court allowed Mrs Herold’s third-party planning appeal, holding that the Minister unlawfully approved development that failed to preserve Seymour Cottage’s setting under Policy HE1.
Explore more
