Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
U v W (Matrimonial) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Daultrey : Matrimonial) [2025] JRC 281 (4 November 2025)
The Jersey Royal Court set aside a decree nisi and decree absolute after finding the respondent was not served and the acknowledgement of service was forged.
Representation of Prospect Capital Security Trustees Limited (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Civil) : Le Cocq : Debt) [2025] JCA 265 (17 October 2025)
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against a Royal Court judgment and AVCD, holding the challenge had no real prospect of success.
W v X (Family) 16-Nov-2020 [2020] JRC 240 (15 November 2020)
The Royal Court dismissed a father’s appeal against child maintenance orders, holding the Registrar had applied the correct approach, made no procedural error, and the award was affordable.
Incat v Luba Freeport [2010] JLR 435 (07 September 2010)
The case clarifies that an appeal to the Royal Court against taxation by the Greffier is limited to procedural irregularity, irrelevant factors, omitted relevant factors, or an otherwise wrong decision.
Downes v Marshall [2010] JLR 265 (23 June 2010)
The Royal Court limited appeals from the Family Registrar in financial provision cases to procedural irregularity, irrelevant considerations, failure to consider relevant matters, or an otherwise wrong conclusion.
United Capital v Bender [2006] JLR 1 (16 January 2006)
The court held that incorrect service on a non-resident defendant could be treated as valid where the defendant knew the claim and suffered no prejudice.
Fitzpatrick v AG [2005] JRC 020A (25 February 2005)
The court allowed a sentence appeal in a perverting the course of justice case, finding no serious procedural irregularity but correcting disparity with a co-defendant.
Tomes v Coke Wallis Taxation appeal [2002] JRC 9 (14 January 2002)
The court allowed an appeal against taxation of costs after finding the defendants were denied the chance to seek an oral taxation hearing under Rule 9A.
1999/23 - Ashbourne Marketing v Mosca and Yankee Exports [1999] UR 23 (4 February 1999)
Appeal over substituted service was allowed aside. The court held ordinary service in Maine was straightforward, so the substituted service order should not stand.
Explore more
