Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Y v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal) : MacRae) [2026] JRC 035 (28 January 2026)
The Royal Court of Jersey heard a sex offender denotification application in private and removed notification requirements after finding current risk no longer justified them.
D v AG (Royal Court : Hearing (Criminal)) [2025] JRC 037 (4 February 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted an application to end sex offender notification requirements, finding the applicant posed a low risk and that private hearing was justified.
Z v AG [2024] JRC 002 (03 January 2024)
The Jersey Royal Court granted Z’s application to end sex offender notification requirements, finding the remaining risk did not justify continued registration.
AG v Pallot [2022] JRC 234 (01 November 2022)
The Jersey Royal Court sentenced a defendant for downloading and distributing indecent images of children, imposing 3 years’ imprisonment and ancillary orders.
J v AG 19-Oct-2020 [2020] JRC 219 (19 October 2020)
The court granted an application to lift sex offender notification requirements, finding the applicant remained low risk and no longer needed ongoing notification.
AG v Le Gros [2020] JRC 068 (24 April 2020)
After guilty pleas to serious offences, the court found no exceptional circumstances and remanded Mr Le Gros in custody for two weeks pending sentencing.
K v AG 26-Sep-2019 [2019] JRC 193 (26 September 2019)
The Jersey Royal Court lifted sex offender notification requirements for K, finding continued monitoring disproportionate despite a moderate risk assessment.
Benest v AG [2019] JRC 068 (24 April 2019)
The court discharged both the applicant’s sex offender notification requirements and a restraining order, finding his future risk of sexual harm was low.
AG -v- N [2018] JRC 011 (16 January 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted an adult applicant’s request to be removed from sex offender notification requirements, and ordered the hearing and judgment anonymised.
L -v- AG [2016] JRC 152 (01 September 2016)
The Royal Court refused to hear a sex-offender notification application in private, holding that open justice prevailed and no exceptional circumstances justified secrecy.
Explore more
