Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2025] JRC 289

S v T

S v T (Matrimonial) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Daultrey : Matrimonial) [2025] JRC 289 (3 November 2025)

The Royal Court reviewed spousal and child maintenance after divorce, declined to vary the existing awards for ordinary maintenance, and set tertiary education support at ÂŁ400 per month per child.

  • Spousal maintenance
  • Child maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Tertiary education support
  • Clean break
  • Disability and earning capacity
Read case analysis
Family law [2020] JRC 081

U v V (Family)

U v V (Family) [2020] JRC 081 (07 May 2020)

The Royal Court of Jersey varied a child maintenance confirmation order, reducing maintenance to ÂŁ375 per month and setting arrears at ÂŁ1,775, while setting aside an unargued extension to tertiary education.

  • Maintenance order enforcement
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Appeal procedure
  • Cross-jurisdictional child support
  • Child-maintenance
  • Maintenance-order-enforcement
Read case analysis
Family law [2019] JRC 231A

N v O (Family)

N v O (Family) [2019] JRC 231A (03 December 2019)

The court varied a child maintenance order upward from the application date, but refused to remit arrears, holding the father responsible for unpaid sums and childcare contributions.

  • Child maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Arrears of maintenance
  • Child care costs
  • Child-maintenance
  • Maintenance-arrears
Read case analysis
Family law [2018] JRC 160

U v V (Family)

U v V (Family) [2018] JRC 160 (04 September 2018)

The court adjourned an application to reduce child maintenance, leaving the existing order in place until a planned review, and required both parents to prepare for relocation and work arrangements.

  • Child maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Financial provision for children
  • Schedule 1 children (jersey) law 2002
  • Child-maintenance
  • Variation-of-maintenance-orders
Read case analysis
Family law [2017] JRC 123

Q -v- R

Q -v- R (Matrimonial) [2017] JRC 123 (01 August 2017)

In a spousal maintenance review, the Royal Court refused disclosure about the respondent’s new wife’s income and certain bank transactions, finding them presently irrelevant.

  • Spousal maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Financial disclosure
  • Consent orders
  • Spousal-maintenance
  • Financial-disclosure
Read case analysis
Family law [2014] JRC 191

W -v- X

W -v- X (Matrimonial) [2014] JRC 191 (07 October 2014)

The Royal Court held it could order a costs allowance in a maintenance variation application and ordered the respondent to contribute £10,000 toward the petitioner’s legal fees.

  • Maintenance
  • Legal costs
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Costs allowance
  • Ancillary relief
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law [2011] JRC 041A

In the matter of P

In the matter of P [2011] JRC 041A (17 February 2011)

The court found a material change in the father’s finances and reduced child maintenance from £2,238 to £1,450 per month, with no arrears payable.

  • Child maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Financial provision for children
  • Child-maintenance
  • Variation-of-maintenance-orders
  • Financial-provision-for-children
Read case analysis
Family law [2004] JRC 218A

W v O

W v O [2004] JRC 218A (14 December 2004)

The court varied an agreed child maintenance order, reducing payments to reflect the father’s shared care arrangements and his responsibility for two additional children.

  • Child maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance orders
  • Shared care
  • Financial provision
  • Child-maintenance
  • Maintenance-variation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.