Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Royal Court held that the Tribunal had erred in treating the new Article 40A costs regime as compensatory and in importing a wasted-costs requirement.
BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation v Camilla de Bourbon des deux Siciles [2021] JRC 268 (01 November 2021)
The Royal Court awarded indemnity costs to the Representor after dismissing three unreasonable summonses, and declined to pursue a wasted costs inquiry against counsel.
Chernukhin and Anor v Deripaska and Anor 11-Feb-2021 [2021] JRC 039 (11 February 2021)
The Royal Court ruled on amendment, privilege, wasted costs, and further information applications in pre-trial proceedings, allowing some requests and refusing others.
Jamera v Le Feuvre [2020] JRC 154 (03 August 2020)
Costs judgment awarding the plaintiff 70% of the costs of an expert-replacement application and hearing, with wasted costs ordered on a standard basis.
MacFirbhisigh and ching -v- CI Trustees and Others [2017] JRC 141A (06 September 2017)
The Royal Court held that a wasted costs application should be heard by the Commissioner with two Jurats, because it involves factual disputes and not mere procedure.
MacFirbhisigh and Ching -v- CI Trustees and Others [2017] JRC 140A (04 September 2017)
The Royal Court refused Sinels leave to appeal against an interlocutory wasted-costs ruling, finding no real prospect of success and no public-advantage question.
MacFirbhisigh and Ching -v- CI Trustees and Others [2017] JRC 130A (14 August 2017)
The Royal Court refused Sinels’ strike-out and reverse summary judgment application in wasted costs proceedings, holding that causation on the later costs claim should go to trial.
Kuwait Oil Tanker Company -v- Al Mutawa and Chadwick [2017] JRC 049 (27 March 2017)
Post-judgment costs ruling awarding indemnity wasted costs and capping application costs at ÂŁ25,000 after a defendant clarified she was a creditor, not an heir.
Kuwait Oil Tanker Company SAK -v- Al Mutawa and Chadwick [2016] JRC 182 (10 October 2016)
The court ordered the first defendant to clarify whether her claim to a debt was by inheritance or as a creditor, but refused an unless order.
In the matter of the Amy Tutelles [2011] JCA 151 (03 August 2011)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for costs in favour of Mr Barnett and ordered Mr Sinel personally to pay the costs of the 28 July 2011 hearing.
Explore more
