Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
X v Y (Family) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Wright : Family) [2026] JRC 019 (16 January 2026)
The Jersey Royal Court found allegations that the father posed a risk of sexual, physical, or emotional harm were unproven and ordered interim contact to resume.
In the matter of VV (Secure Accommodation Order) (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil)) [2025] JRC 027 (28 January 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey granted a secure accommodation order for VV for five weeks, finding the statutory test met but limiting the period and requiring a revised care plan.
In the matter of QQ (Care proceedings) [2023] JRC 170 (20 September 2023)
The Royal Court of Jersey refused to discharge an interim care order, holding that the child’s welfare still required ongoing assessment and court protection at the residential unit.
In the matter of DD (Care order) [2023] JRC 066 (28 April 2023)
The court granted a final care order, finding threshold met and approving the Minister’s care plan for a 14-year-old child beyond parental control.
The Royal Court extended a supervision order for FF, keeping contact with C supervised and emphasizing the child’s welfare, safeguarding work, and continuing risk.
In the matter of FF (Supervision Order) [2022] JRC 224 (11 October 2022)
The court found the threshold met and made a 12-month Supervision Order, requiring the child to return to live with his mother and her partner.
F v G (Family) [2022] JRC 206 (03 October 2022)
The appeal was allowed after the court held that the Registrar gave undue weight to urgency and status quo, without sufficient inquiry into serious welfare allegations.
Between v Q [2021] JRC 331 (09 November 2021)
The Royal Court ordered continued contact between the applicant and both children, including alternate weekends and midweek overnight contact, and refused a residence order.
F v E (Matrimonial) 31-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 120 (31 March 2021)
In a child-vaccination dispute, the court held that G should receive the MMR and flu vaccines. It found no reliable evidence of a specific medical contraindication.
O v P (Matrimonial) [2020] JRC 161A (10 August 2020)
The court granted a shared residence order, equal time for Child 1 with both parents, and revised holiday and passport arrangements, while keeping handover arrangements unchanged.
Explore more
