Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Royal Court refused a defence application to use prior complaints and sexual history evidence, finding no reasonable basis to infer any earlier complaint was false.
AG v RD [2024] JRC 050 (29 February 2024)
Pre-trial rape ruling allowing a single defence question on prior consensual intercourse to explore possible alternative causes of genital injuries.
AG v RL [2021] JRC 188 (09 July 2021)
The Jersey Royal Court held that pre-incident text messages about sexual intentions were inadmissible, and refused expert evidence on alcohol-related memory impairment.
Trico Limited v Buckingham [2020] JRC 106 (04 June 2020)
Interlocutory ruling on hearsay cross-examination, video-link evidence, and costs. The court permitted limited cross-examination of Mr Atherton and ordered subpoena costs in the cause.
AG v Yuksel 23-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 209 (23 October 2019)
The Royal Court granted leave for overseas complainants to give evidence by live television link under Article 14A, but refused the same request for UK-based witnesses.
The Royal Court refused to vacate the final hearing in a contested civil forfeiture case, declined to order the respondent’s personal attendance, and set limited further directions.
Monks -v- AG [2018] JRC 115 (02 July 2018)
The Royal Court of Jersey allowed a criminal appeal against a grave and criminal assault conviction, finding the prosecution evidence too inconsistent and unreliable.
W -v- AG [2017] JCA 196 (22 November 2017)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against conviction, holding there was no proper evidential basis to cross-examine a complainant about an alleged false rape complaint against another man.
AG -v- W [2017] JRC 111A (18 July 2017)
Interlocutory sexual offence ruling on cross-examination and screens: some evidence about failure to complain and proven false allegations was allowed, but sexual-history material was excluded.
W -v- JFSC [2017] JRC 040A (07 March 2017)
On a pre-trial review in an administrative appeal, the court refused further reasons, broad disclosure, and cross-examination, but allowed limited disclosure and affidavits.
Explore more
