Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Lagadu -v- Minister for Planning and Environment [2015] JRC 054 (10 March 2015)
The Royal Court upheld a planning permission for balconies at 10 La Chasse, finding the Minister’s decision was not unreasonable despite some loss of light and privacy.
Hobson -v- Minister for Planning and Fairman [2012] JRC 200 (01 November 2012)
Appeal allowed against permission for a garage in the Coastal National Park. The court found Policy NE6 was misapplied and the departure from prior planning history was unjustified.
Ledo -v- Planning & Environment 23-Jun-06 [2006] JRC 088A (23 October 2006)
The Royal Court of Jersey dismissed an appeal against refusal of development permission for a driveway across farmland, holding the decision was not unreasonable.
Sunier v Planing and Environment [2003] JRC 188 (23 October 2003)
The Royal Court allowed an appeal against a planning enforcement notice, finding the committee’s decision unreasonable because it relied on inadequate evidence and should have involved a site visit.
Planning and Environment v Le Maistre [2002] JCA 129 (11 July 2002)
The Court of Appeal held that the Planning and Environment Committee’s refusal of permission in the Agricultural Priority Zone was not unreasonable and allowed the appeal.
AG v Benest [2002] JRC 118 (11 June 2002)
The court found Mr Stein did not say no permit was needed, and that the site meeting left the nature and scale of the proposed development insufficiently clear.
Le Maistre v P and E [2001] JRC 158 (25 July 2001)
The Royal Court allowed an appeal against refusal of development permission for a bungalow on a small field in the Agricultural Priority Zone.
Dowell Ltd v Island Development Committee [1990] JRC 100 (11 July 1990)
The Jersey court dismissed Dowell Ltd’s challenge to the Island Development Committee’s refusal of development permission, holding the decision was within statutory powers.
Explore more
