Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2015] JRC 141

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd

Holmes -v- Lingard HJL Holdings Ltd and Angel Fish Ltd [2015] JRC 141 (29 June 2015)

The Royal Court discharged ex parte interim injunctions because they were obtained without notice and on inadequate disclosure, then refused to re-impose them.

  • Ex parte injunctions
  • Duty of full and frank disclosure
  • Balance of convenience
  • Adequacy of damages
  • Ex-parte-injunctions
  • Full-and-frank-disclosure
Read case analysis
Company law [2015] JRC 041

Ogden -v- Voice Commerce Group Limited

Ogden -v- Voice Commerce Group Limited [2015] JRC 041 (20 February 2015)

The Royal Court discharged an ex parte interim injunction after finding serious non-disclosure and no serious issue to justify continuing relief.

  • Compulsory share transfer
  • Interim injunction
  • Duty of full and frank disclosure
  • Employment termination
  • Valuation of shares
  • Interim-injunction
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2002] JLR 424

Goldtron Ltd. v Most Invs. Ltd.

Goldtron Ltd. v Most Invs. Ltd. [2002] JLR 424 (09 August 2002)

The court discharged a Mareva injunction after finding the ex parte applicant had not made full and frank disclosure of known potential defences.

  • Mareva injunction
  • Ex parte applications
  • Duty of full and frank disclosure
  • Misrepresentation
  • Non-disclosure
  • Mareva-injunction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.