Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2020] JRC 071A

W v X (Family)

W v X (Family) [2020] JRC 071A (28 April 2020)

Family appeal over interim child maintenance, disclosure, costs, and enforcement under Jersey Schedule 1. The Court refused relief and made no orders.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Variation of maintenance
  • Costs
  • Enforcement of maintenance
  • Disclosure obligations
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law [2016] JRC 223B

S -v- T

S -v- T (Matrimonial) [2016] JRC 223B (05 December 2016)

The Royal Court awarded the husband ÂŁ3,575 per month in interim maintenance, finding he had immediate needs pending financial proceedings and that the wife could pay.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Ancillary relief
  • Matrimonial finance
  • Maintenance pending suit
  • Interim-maintenance
  • Maintenance-pending-suit
Read case analysis
Family law [2015] JRC 168A

Q -v- R

Q -v- R (Matrimonial) [2015] JRC 168A (17 August 2015)

Appeal against interim maintenance orders was allowed after the court found the factual basis for the award unsafe and remitted the matter for rehearing.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Appeals
  • Procedural fairness
  • Disclosure of financial information
  • Family-law
  • Interim-maintenance
Read case analysis
Family law [2010] JRC 134A

In the matter of ZZ

In the matter of ZZ [2010] JRC 134A (19 July 2010)

Interim maintenance and costs were ordered in a Jersey matrimonial case, and the petitioner was awarded the full net proceeds of sale of the former family home.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Financial provision
  • Maintenance pending suit
  • Sale of matrimonial property
  • Legal costs
  • Interim-maintenance
Read case analysis
Family law [2009] JRC 170A

K v P

K v P [2009] JRC 170A (25 August 2009)

On an interim maintenance application in divorce proceedings, the court ordered the husband to pay the wife ÂŁ1,000 in four monthly instalments and directed her to consider legal aid.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Ancillary relief
  • Legal aid eligibility
  • Spousal support
  • Interim-maintenance
  • Ancillary-relief
Read case analysis
Family law [2008] JCA 127A

Mubarik v Mubarak

Mubarik v Mubarak [2008] JCA 127A (08 August 2008)

A Jersey Court of Appeal single judge declined to make interim maintenance and security-for-costs orders condition precedent to an appeal, but adjourned the summons generally.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Security for costs
  • Case management
  • Appeal procedure
  • Interim-maintenance
  • Security-for-costs
Read case analysis
Family law [2003] JRC 155

PS v C

PS v C [2003] JRC 155 (09 September 2003)

The Royal Court refused to vary a £20,000 monthly maintenance order, holding that interim maintenance was not comparable to the final order and noting the respondent’s non-compliance.

  • Variation of maintenance order
  • Compliance with court orders
  • Interim maintenance
  • Final maintenance
  • Family-law
  • Maintenance-orders
Read case analysis
Family law [2003] JCA 012

PS v C

PS v C [2003] JCA 012 (17 January 2003)

Interlocutory family appeal about interim maintenance, legal fees, and an escrow account. The Court of Appeal upheld the maintenance orders and substituted a fresh order.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Legal costs
  • Variation of maintenance
  • Escrow accounts
  • Compliance with court orders
  • Family-law
Read case analysis
Family law [2002] JRC 141

PS v C

PS v C [2002] JRC 141 (22 July 2002)

The court ordered interim maintenance of ÂŁ20,000 per month for a wife and four children, from the date of the summons, pending the final divorce hearing.

  • Interim maintenance
  • Ancillary relief
  • Divorce
  • Child maintenance
  • Interim-maintenance
  • Child-maintenance
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.