Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
W v X (Family) [2020] JRC 071A (28 April 2020)
Family appeal over interim child maintenance, disclosure, costs, and enforcement under Jersey Schedule 1. The Court refused relief and made no orders.
In the matter of Eleanor (Care proceedings) [2018] JRC 209 (16 November 2018)
The Royal Court granted temporary approval for a child in care to remain at a Scottish placement pending further reports, finding the move was in her best interests.
I v J (Matrimonial) [2018] JRC 144A (13 August 2018)
On an interim residence application in a matrimonial dispute, the Royal Court ordered shared care and required both parents to reduce conflict and live separately from the family home in rotation.
JT v JCRA [2017] JRC 091 (15 June 2017)
The Royal Court held that a consent interim order delayed a JCRA price-control decision until seven days after JT withdrew its appeal, making the effective date 24 February 2017.
In re William (Interim Supervision Order/Residence Order) [2017] 1 JLR 200 (14 June 2017)
An interim residence order was granted in favour of William’s grandparents, despite no formal assessment under the Children (Placement) (Jersey) Regulations 2005, because it served the child’s best interests.
In the matter of the A Children (Care order) [2017] JRC 071 (18 May 2017)
The court found the threshold for interim child protection orders was met, but made no interim care order and left the children in their mother’s care pending further assessment.
U -v- V (Matrimonial) [2015] JRC 155 (14 July 2015)
The Royal Court refused competing applications to vary interim spousal maintenance, keeping the monthly payment at ÂŁ2,800 until the imminent final hearing.
In re D (Care Order) v [2013] 2 JLR 119 (29 May 2013)
The court granted an interim care order for a child, applying the welfare principle, the no-order principle, and the significant-harm test under Jersey law.
In the matter of WW [2010] JRC 166B (14 September 2010)
On an interim child maintenance application, the court increased the father’s payment to £2,024 per month for two children, applying the CSA benchmark.
In the matter of V [2010] JRC 140 (29 July 2010)
The court made interim care orders for three children after finding threshold criteria under the Children (Jersey) Law 2002 were met and the orders were in their best interests.
Explore more
