Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Investin Quay House Limited (in Liquidation) v BUJ Architects LLP [2021] JRC 255 (13 October 2021)
The Royal Court refused leave to appeal and a stay of execution after an earlier refusal of injunctive relief, and ordered the plaintiff to pay costs.
STM Fiduciaire -v- Bay Isles [2011] JRC 212 (02 November 2011)
After withdrawal of claims seeking injunctions, the court held the evidence against the defendants was too weak and awarded them indemnity costs.
The Royal Court held that ex parte injunctions based on rumour and suspicion would likely have been lifted, and ordered the defendants’ costs on the indemnity basis.
UCC -v- Bender & Ors 14-Jul-2006 [2006] JCA 102 (14 July 2006)
The Jersey Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against an injunction restraining John Koonmen from pursuing US 28 U.S.C. § 1782 proceedings.
Whitesmith Ltd. v Papyrus Invs. Ltd. [2003] JLR_Note 37 (04 August 2003)
A Jersey law report note on interlocutory injunctions, recognizing that a defendant may be entitled to legitimate expenses during the injunction period.
Jersey Produce Mktg. Organisation Ltd. v States [2002] JLR_Note 32 (22 July 2002)
A Jersey Law Reports note setting out guidelines to be observed when considering an application for an interlocutory injunction.
Rossborough v Boon [2001] JRC 157 (25 July 2001)
The Jersey Royal Court considered whether former insurance employees had been constructively dismissed and whether restrictive covenants in their contracts should be enforced.
Jersey Produce Mktg. v Hi-Ho Growers Ltd. [2001] JLR 266 (10 May 2001)
On withdrawal of an application for an interlocutory mandatory injunction, the defendant was entitled to costs. The applicant had a duty to make enquiries before applying.
Dataview 32 Limited v Ensynergy International Limi [2001] JRC 66 (20 March 2001)
The court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from marketing competing software in the Territory, finding a serious issue to be tried and damages inadequate.
Explore more
