Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Abramovich v Chief Minister of Jersey and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin) [2025] JRC 308 (21 November 2025)
The Royal Court granted summary judgment on the GOJ Defendants’ failure to meet DSAR time limits under the Data Protection (Jersey) Law, but left damages for trial.
Neville v Bray and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Mowschenson : Planning) [2025] JRC 139 (23 May 2025)
The Jersey Royal Court dismissed a misfeasance in public office claim arising from planning enforcement and prosecution over unauthorized window replacements.
Neville v Bray and Ors [2022] JRC 271 (07 December 2022)
The Royal Court held the misfeasance claims were not time-barred, kept the individual defendants in the case under representative conduct, and struck out claims against the Attorney General and a deceased defendant.
Huda v Minister for Health and Social Services 13-Jan-2021 [2021] JRC 007 (13 January 2021)
The Royal Court declined to strike out the defendant’s answer for discovery failures, but found serious breaches of preservation and ordered further searches, a proper document list, and indemnity costs.
Huda v Minister for Health and Social Services [2020] JRC 029 (17 February 2020)
The court allowed a misfeasance claim based on reckless indifference to proceed, but struck out targeted malice and negligence claims arising from a safeguarding referral.
Pearce v Chief Officer of States of Jersey Police [2019] JRC 225 (19 November 2019)
The court allowed amendment of a representation about frozen bank accounts, refused to strike out the pleadings, and stayed the civil claim pending criminal proceedings.
Boschat -v- Chief of States of Jersey Police [2015] JRC 220A (03 November 2015)
The Royal Court of Jersey struck out Mr Boschat’s claims against the States of Jersey Police as time-barred, finding empêchement did not suspend prescription.
Syvret -v- AG [2012] JRC 138B (16 July 2012)
The Court refused a recusal application and struck out Mr Syvret’s claim against the Attorney General as plainly without merit, holding the police were responsible for the relevant actions.
Syvret v AG and Connetable of Grouville [2011] JCA 146 (28 July 2011)
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against refusal of judicial review and refused adjournment applications, holding the challenge was out of time and should be raised in criminal proceedings.
Syvret v Chief Minister and Others [2011] JRC 116 (20 June 2011)
The Royal Court struck out Mr Syvret’s claim as disclosing no cause of action and refused his recusal application, finding no apparent bias.
Explore more
