Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
AG -v- O'Brien [2015] JRC 098 (11 May 2015)
The Jersey Royal Court sentenced the defendant to 27 months' imprisonment for larceny and receiving stolen property, treating alcohol and a long record as aggravating factors.
Att. Gen. v MacKenzie [2011] JLR 689 (31 August 2011)
On sentencing for possession with intent to supply drugs, the court held that “social supply” to friends at cost or for free is a mitigating factor.
AG -v- Hagen [2010] JRC 058 (19 March 2010)
Sentencing for drug trafficking offences in Jersey, the court imposed 4 years’ imprisonment on Hagen, allowing mitigation for personal circumstances and remand time.
AG -v- Greenan [2005] JRC 182 (07 October 2005)
Sentencing for murder in Jersey: life imprisonment with a 20-year minimum term after the court reduced a 30-year starting point for mitigation.
AG -v- Goss [2005] JRC 132 (27 September 2005)
The Jersey Royal Court sentenced a man guilty of murder to life imprisonment and fixed a minimum term of 11 years, after applying mitigation and a guilty plea discount.
AG v Neil [2004] JRC 088 (14 May 2004)
Sentencing for possession of a Class A drug. The court treated the offending as social supply, considered mitigation and imposed suspended prison terms.
AG v Croke [2003] JRC 170 (03 October 2003)
Sentencing for benefit fraud in Jersey: despite the seriousness of the offence and prior dishonesty convictions, probation was imposed because of the defendant’s seriously ill infant child.
AG v Barton [2003] JRC 164 (18 September 2003)
On sentencing, the court held that Barton breached temporary release conditions by entering a public house and imposed two months’ consecutive imprisonment.
Munks v AG [2003] JCA 044 (06 March 2003)
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against Munks’ 30-month sentence, holding the totality was not excessive and that consecutive sentencing was proper.
AG v Smale [2002] JRC 194A (11 October 2002)
Sentencing appeal in a cannabis resin case, where the Royal Court imposed 2.5 years’ imprisonment after considering quantity, guilty plea, and mitigation.
Explore more
